Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 01 December 2013 04:33 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470E91AE2DF; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdkiT9K0XQQQ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49301AE08F; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id en1so3416843wid.15 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HcwA4JJ2IeeMbvdQ2yHlQC5bVlyhRs7uW4eVsNkCFg8=; b=HjcCPaTfJizCyExXdvPCU9CgaGDZTjdWVJWlirBiHSM4s6gDUgk43mlJBEj+4JwQnD A7OkFlR7q4g/kJDcv6+r4Oak1mQJaRLnzgtsQwefxHru8FzElOApovYaK3fJA98jB7j/ L4e048eQKaiVH1BgivoLX2pf4DuQTNeZQsmU/XjkmuxWlWYgRJ+0LmSPiLIliAJUMo6E C0cCsZ+ZxG1R5Dh+y8FskqIvrIGr2L6BJ4o5IjUfoElmTf8oeW9dsy1YzomYw+xptGTm MnfFbXPTMQ9B6P3k1YwDGZZ+2mm6ovTyV8HLBb69UKxxDasFl9FCSXwzSN5KcbW8hdML 5HAw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.182.136 with SMTP id ee8mr12927080wic.19.1385872380677; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.13.230 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZbN+ReEg9pTmqxFwP6pRK8-oJpWfEdfgvXAYWCwF5o7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20131120223533.8958.23858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbH0e_Z-9OKNf3cJ9RpsRLK6vmnQtfj8dbZkLxmz2GaRA@mail.gmail.com> <01P14CWFCE5A00004G@mauve.mrochek.com> <5294DDEE.4070000@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwY4Zbig3pb9W41fo5ttt2FgLPyOwPxLFQFJuUTtO5D75A@mail.gmail.com> <529613CD.8060307@qti.qualcomm.com> <01P1CS3LR0X000004G@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAL0qLwZbN+ReEg9pTmqxFwP6pRK8-oJpWfEdfgvXAYWCwF5o7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:33:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa0KoRM71uxdi-sLQhDGG36wxeOjJ7jiq6a+N8xVHYQDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e016346b4f454c704ec718ee5"
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 04:33:05 -0000
http://www.blackops.org/~msk/draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-from--10.diff.html I'll send it Monday unless I hear otherwise. On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>wrote: > Concur. I'll send that out momentarily to you guys and, if no objections, > I'll send it to the RFC Editor to replace -11. > > -MSK > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote: > >> Everything in the diff you sent looks great. Just one outstanding bit: >>> >> >> On 11/26/13 12:23 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> > >>> > 7.5 - >>> > What's the difference between 3& 4? Or maybe I don't >>> > know what "compound >>> > instance" means in 3. >>> > >>> > >>> > You never did answer that question. >>> > >>> > >>> > I thought I clarified that in the latest draft by explaining what was >>> > meant by "compound instance". >>> >> >> Could you give me an example of 3 (a compound instance) which is not a 4? >>> >> >> I don't know of any in RFC 5322, but I've seen content-disposition >> information >> scattered across multiple instances of the header. But not often enough to >> bother coding any kind of support to handle it. >> >> That said, "3 but not 4" would appear to be sufficiently obscure that I >> have no >> problem with combining them. >> >> Ned >> > >
- [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-a… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… John R Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] reject and process, was Pete R… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ie… Pete Resnick