IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B631AD2EC; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:46:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJ5bqLqpNwVf; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:46:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450441ACCDC; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:46:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1385567184; x=1417103184; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=k09OZZ2sDX3pk7S/v0fLddQaYM6UBLHDY3lntZvCVLo=; b=VKQODMej0eOTcrU+75vTVAyIKOaF/GQcm+BFVDozhVnkx76wJM726BRz kmzeG7doI+SeHPKMV/e7hGzCJngkPfASWVzI/BkimhcIIf3LHceiWygEk 1ORFdPgbMW9JjH1+sL3eoYkNRxE0SVlcCocDGdB8WUOkrU+mAuYl1pgBL E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7271"; a="89383794"
Received: from ironmsg02-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.183]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 27 Nov 2013 07:46:23 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7271"; a="23310400"
Received: from nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.7]) by ironmsg02-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 Nov 2013 07:46:23 -0800
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:46:22 -0800
Message-ID: <529613CD.8060307@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:46:21 -0600
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <20131120223533.8958.23858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbH0e_Z-9OKNf3cJ9RpsRLK6vmnQtfj8dbZkLxmz2GaRA@mail.gmail.com> <01P14CWFCE5A00004G@mauve.mrochek.com> <5294DDEE.4070000@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwY4Zbig3pb9W41fo5ttt2FgLPyOwPxLFQFJuUTtO5D75A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY4Zbig3pb9W41fo5ttt2FgLPyOwPxLFQFJuUTtO5D75A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090202030504010905030405"
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:46:43 -0000

Everything in the diff you sent looks great. Just one outstanding bit:

On 11/26/13 12:23 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>                 7.5 -
>                 What's the difference between 3&  4? Or maybe I don't
>                 know what "compound
>                 instance" means in 3.
>
>
>     You never did answer that question.
>
>
> I thought I clarified that in the latest draft by explaining what was 
> meant by "compound instance".

Could you give me an example of 3 (a compound instance) which is not a 4?

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email