IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 22 November 2013 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352BF1AE064; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JWP9-FJWszdJ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com (mail-we0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAA41AE1F7; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q58so1599616wes.33 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ns+eS6F30+Ze+D+b5EAq/pe2SnGJ28THB8cdObOxt5o=; b=oqO8QUDPzu8jCUWMBuvmUKzNpPXSpBYrQcy0aT585pfZHfuC205y9IwDMUTVl9fqyg FXiisdpkGdICm2NXMax3nr/1IpkkNEKN5Z6po1niIZDVdm0TO66EKR4UZGw9W1h911gU bbMdsnQYxrr5CuzgVBRjKHRWhrLlkpn6aR4OINoQw+rv17ydLvp6RmNu9DdQEJL2VSEy ftnHnHmxnhr6fiw2DfQ4J4+PMaT4TYX9Rca4cBY6FBa6/DkLxn29+wnqjHpGq+r3cbpo C+b4Do5XQflVNx/fgRdlNvyLvPQ9U5noMPVtBXz7nQLMXpEfkf7CbYYainmP8i8HBjyF FXQw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.182.136 with SMTP id ee8mr1639662wic.19.1385149144809; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.13.230 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131120223533.8958.23858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20131120223533.8958.23858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:39:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbH0e_Z-9OKNf3cJ9RpsRLK6vmnQtfj8dbZkLxmz2GaRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e016346b4bcc86904ebc92a24"
Cc: "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Pete Resnick's Yes on draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:39:14 -0000

All of this works for me except:

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>wrote:

> 7.5.3 - What's the harm in more than one Return-Path? Only one of
> interest is the top-most.
>

The issue here is that some components pick the last one, and some pick the
first, in general.  More often this happen with From, but Return-Path is
not special in this regard.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email