IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-delany-nullmx

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EFD1A014E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:16:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sxZ4zqX1oQug for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1D81A014D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y10so11056240wgg.8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:15:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AjMUEsQfDmii0na15JpbAvpTeB7BsQz0H48dKxY8LR4=; b=AkttWOGx6mm7mw9zTkQ0dy+QLMeLEnqeZlZSwcKswzomKSYWxZRVyd5eC4NjklMGXW mcKqRniQHfNZW1d6PBSUh3mXOWNHfol3HpbGHDHvJz9Urc+tOfCX98hhNpdIFvlp9dFL wQYuPOZd1JPBLXBF4Z3lp5Mf8obaXQJNafgimos22mKI6PrAFa/pVD3ddARG+2l/lG7f fXEFFYahatj6vR2kJS8PybpK26sXQoa4cnCOX37KRNpr1uUTYSeogAAPUITKo7wx5Jbv wQcJOsrLkd406ullCVV4yMepJseVA/0wp8i1sYFF20xBd2emNkwyfo8tgkefRMnkYMkD jlWQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.187.16 with SMTP id fo16mr6756923wic.26.1391390158247; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:15:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.98.41 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:15:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52ED1B53.1080701@isdg.net>
References: <CAL0qLwZFF_oDPsUSu7dV6M=JXG7=OAmb50MVwYS_r=ZRtsRtrg@mail.gmail.com> <52ED1B53.1080701@isdg.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:15:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwav5kQ3M9C1X2X5G-8JMCLH7vK7kOz==g+NQWkyGRr3vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c266c4205d8e04f17644e3"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-delany-nullmx
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 01:16:07 -0000

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:

> I support the fast adoption of NULLMX as a BCP method. Not as a standard
> method.  As a PS, it may slow it down because *I don't see too many
> abandoning already long established, well embedded, finely tuned, well
> greased over many years of implicit MX code, queuing, scheduling outbound
> mail logic.*
>

As this describes the exchange of data between two agents (via the DNS),
and not merely a common practice, I believe Proposed Standard is the more
appropriate status rather than BCP.  Any other opinions?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email