IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-delany-nullmx

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 03 February 2014 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15941A0099 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:19:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUcy2UOUPtfN for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:19:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38491A0040 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:19:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s134JMoe032641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:19:26 -0800
Message-ID: <52EF18AD.3080500@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 20:18:53 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZFF_oDPsUSu7dV6M=JXG7=OAmb50MVwYS_r=ZRtsRtrg@mail.gmail.com> <52ED1B53.1080701@isdg.net> <CAL0qLwav5kQ3M9C1X2X5G-8JMCLH7vK7kOz==g+NQWkyGRr3vg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwav5kQ3M9C1X2X5G-8JMCLH7vK7kOz==g+NQWkyGRr3vg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Sun, 02 Feb 2014 20:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-delany-nullmx
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 04:19:32 -0000

On 2/2/2014 5:15 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> As this describes the exchange of data between two agents (via the DNS),
> and not merely a common practice, I believe Proposed Standard is the
> more appropriate status rather than BCP.  Any other opinions?


It is absolutely a protocol spec.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email