IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [taugh.com-standards] Comments on draft-levine-orgboundary

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF6C11E811D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSgayQj4PwFz for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E9F11E8122 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32547 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2013 17:33:58 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Jul 2013 17:33:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51ed6d06.xn--i8sz2z.k1307; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=fver103PPMAA2RQsocYsBEqF46wS9QdYufNx/KzIuNM=; b=2wggLis10DaqUFco1KnHRouScz0tqcxH1O9PSHOVe1tTpDihZcHKg+TwSb0OvyHvkgZKzEiQh1N1vs2DpmxHMhLYyNzFZ3P7iDV1HX9MSJabOwW/HX6r0ES82ZWeZkKavjZts3oBOLq6PygmUIoowwUBU5E6LL9xmXlVIlRLVTYsgUsuR/UkiV//5eKT0Vq3SS2sA9bcqFisL7F+LbXHRoHMxZchEvE0QzsTOxFBbPhRNo1wSrs34GYVqrVLPx6x
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51ed6d06.xn--i8sz2z.k1307; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=fver103PPMAA2RQsocYsBEqF46wS9QdYufNx/KzIuNM=; b=K5OQtsFwaDkWN3PhytMtugAIe/+GZ+ZWPIYXLhBC0cHnuV8hOeN3z0bY9mHMOQjY/F6snOsoAyqM4Fa/7ANsxov0HJlekvm0b9lQaJCkqrCC0brlICsa81HhXDKRddpHCvEYsdH7dTtA0Dj5LOxyxHBF/ic75I7jsu99CYlKtlUxp82bwVU2ZNZjsF6pyXNljrw/XGQ+8XineZznK28kdQplaO3QGyJhiem3vVY/cizHzfIWy2B2WZeFd6IrevYN
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:33:36 -0000
Message-ID: <20130722173336.61136.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20130722140850.GA41416@mx1.yitter.info>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [taugh.com-standards] Comments on draft-levine-orgboundary
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:34:14 -0000

>> You can use my grosse hackque with the wildcards, where the closest
>> encloser rule finds the deepest relevant delegation point.
>
>I really need to spend some more time working out scenarios of that,
>because I'm not entirely sure it works in every case.  I'm not
>entirely sure it _doesn't_, either, but I'm a little nervous about it.

Please do, but given how simple the closest encloser rule is, I'd
be surprised if it didn't work the way I claimed.

>I think the draft could benefit from some more examples in this area.

Easy enough, give or take the paucity of officially designated
example domains.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email