IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E35821F8A85; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:27:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BR3EpGrBtgKX; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B1B21F88D8; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:27:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=602; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1361309261; x=1362518861; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yri0lOJk7ruFBiWtO6P0Us5YGh4IPZr17yp12sVTNCc=; b=SLiPXwNQPlmSInk2u3NYZ2UEEXz4Xu1Tgyb/xHLJJL3RjaKH+oux4GuA 8SHILUY9mHptowbAF6hQQsbA//FcRUq/p++oK1QjQvrxxeCfIOjuyJ9pp h/FJEaKh6jvP2xp3q2yKYQ3roaDUmL5ESdl2vdY667gqkHBpK1UnFW+L8 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEFAOvtI1GtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEhgK6OoENFnOCIQEEOjQLEgEIDhQUQiUCBAENBQiICrAzkCqOXTEHgl9hA6cDgweCJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,697,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="178889060"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2013 21:27:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1JLRdte017405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:27:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.195]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:27:38 -0600
From: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF
Thread-Index: AQHODhKwsPxTte9Ry0KhDmvQvHsA3piCCRiA//+eqLD///s2AA==
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:27:38 +0000
Message-ID: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F8975C6@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367477490@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.1.130117
x-originating-ip: [10.129.24.82]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <02496F7EBBA94347B4FBD3E8780A9AC0@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:27:59 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:27:59 -0000

On 2/19/13 1:47 PM, "Mike Jones" <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:

>I'm strongly against canonicalization.  The XML canonicalization
>experience was horrible and resulted in more interop bugs than any other
>aspect of XML DSIG, XML ENC, etc.  Let's not repeat the mistakes of our
>elders. ;-)
>
>I also haven't seen a clear use case that canonicalization solves that
>can't be more easily solved another way.

I somewhat agree, but have you at least read
draft-staykov-hu-json-canonical-form?  It's pretty straightforward, and
nowhere near as scary as xmlenc.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email