IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 29 July 2011 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B735E8022 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pPc6dMBpSHC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D9B5E8010 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so3205208gxk.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MK1Tr5BLdFZ9L++QPDvfyTozQFWoibw48O7a2r3NgbU=; b=d2y+4myHn2Jm1BlnVmSK5uNDuFm4RlWtSJ2b7Pf/dvqoHZnMew8d1wihd0S2KOt8Sm vERWzHUNjgYz+dmTAcarjQBACgnoRweDS/MXWtk1F77NFi96HHIcIKa8zMaGB5UY0PdD vAUnRN8NfIgirymgNdh7Yu2rGDifUk80YAvbU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.146.105.16 with SMTP id d16mr1298276yac.13.1311958450605; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.32.15 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA58B07C.439%tianlinyi@huawei.com>
References: <4E329D48.3010509@cs.tcd.ie> <CA58B07C.439%tianlinyi@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:54:10 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: izzhDrR8n0U2jxU-yFV9GwKLLcc
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVAiwauUw_5qW_Xn-pyZHsgP9QE7JXK9nxmWgQ+D=UWZEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Linyi Tian 01 <tianlinyi@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:54:11 -0000

> For urn based design, the URN may be too long since SHA256 will have 256
> bytes hash value. Right?
> urn:hash:sha256:NDc0NzgyMGVmOGQ3OGU0...

256 *bits*, so only 32 bytes.  Slightly longer when you base64-encode
it, but it's not too bad.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email