IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item

Linyi Tian 01 <tianlinyi@huawei.com> Fri, 29 July 2011 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tianlinyi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5E421F8B29 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.381, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXfxT0h25NM2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1B821F8B22 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LP3005MSUCX17@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:10:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LP3005HKUCXYQ@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:10:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [130.129.86.170] (dhcp-56aa.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.86.170]) by szxml11-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LP300AVCUCSLT@szxml11-in.huawei.com>; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:10:09 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:10:02 +0200
From: Linyi Tian 01 <tianlinyi@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <CAC4RtVAiwauUw_5qW_Xn-pyZHsgP9QE7JXK9nxmWgQ+D=UWZEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-id: <CA58B5E8.440%tianlinyi@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-topic: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:10:17 -0000

On 11-7-29 下午6:54, "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

>> For urn based design, the URN may be too long since SHA256 will have 256
>> bytes hash value. Right?
>> urn:hash:sha256:NDc0NzgyMGVmOGQ3OGU0...
>
>256 *bits*, so only 32 bytes.  Slightly longer when you base64-encode
>it, but it's not too bad.

Yes, I meant for 256 bits:) Thanks for the correction.

>
>Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email