IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 29 July 2011 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E94E21F8B75 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Za4U652z5m0l for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.32.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF9221F8B79 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD6B171C6C; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:45:22 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1311939922; bh=tjAfEqr9AlKfJX dCi0p9hjb91O3oLCwPq0H0EOJSCBQ=; b=igx9J5FlL9VOt941UM4Ve9ruLOVe5M uQw/HPl+XvGJsGuninNfseMJ10uv24S98bUh/cTg45zZ/zgFm/HAcRzQ+of1jF1f +vponawVWFUVSMDbZxUClq7wI4J3VGcXBElI6VbsL3umSJ7tnnQ75kKHyyJ10kKJ CNiecN022eApswTJuhzxDswxBq9trMFyWo4f9qyCvK7iWTXUp944WdYoJ4hRIELp rCdPTMYIEfsWuNfOD2jY9mNADg+soaHUVaCW5uPC7VwYT3FeruUW4jEI194Nrg4i xYIunBhZ0bTjOGpKYtNTDP7RkZzcG35UsvBBgFbQTGY0dnlBiEwBkJKw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id SC9rHK3Q6-wX; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:45:22 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [130.129.17.184] (dhcp-11b8.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.17.184]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC2AD171C55; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:45:13 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4E329D48.3010509@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:45:12 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <CA56328E.2FE%tianlinyi@huawei.com> <4E3166F2.4020104@cs.tcd.ie> <4E31CBD3.8040200@stpeter.im> <4E31EB51.5010408@cs.tcd.ie> <4E320000.7060909@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4E320000.7060909@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] proposing draft-farrell-ni as an appsarea wg item
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:45:28 -0000

On 29/07/11 01:34, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 7/28/11 7:05 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/07/11 21:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't see the need for an authority component, but maybe I'm missing
>>> something in the use cases.
>>
>> Within the information centric kind of stuff we do (as research, not
>> ready for IETF prime time by any means) we have a need for a DNS or
>> DNS-like authority. We also have use-cases for no authority part at
>> all in that same space.
>>
>> I basically just allowed the hash-string for authority since it seemed
>> like fun:-) That is, I have no concrete use case for that now.
> 
> It would be good to get an idea of the use cases people have. I've heard
> about various folks who might want a hash URI scheme, but I haven't
> heard about specific use cases they've got.

Good plan. It'd be great to hear what similar requirements/use-cases
exist,

S.



> 
> Peter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email