Re: [apps-discuss] New appsawg documents

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 30 August 2011 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C4C21F8DF4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dL9JeuoQaxO6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2beaomr09.btconnect.com [213.123.26.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D8F21F8DBE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host109-153-79-81.range109-153.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([109.153.79.81]) by c2beaomr09.btconnect.com with SMTP id EEO29932; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:07:54 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <004001cc6736$d4baab40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <CALaySJKw3zwR-Joxm8oBi8Y6b4E0zq5r5HbNGykDaotVTdGeXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:04:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0303.4E5D26FA.006A, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.8.30.164814:17:7.586, ip=109.153.79.81, rules=__HAS_MSGID, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, CT_TP_8859_1, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __INT_PROD_COMP, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr09.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0204.4E5D26FA.0152, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New appsawg documents
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:06:30 -0000

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Apps Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:37 AM
> As noted in the minutes from IETF 81:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/appsawg.txt
> ... the Applications Area Working Group is picking up seven new
> documents.  After some post-IETF travel and catch-up, it's time for
> your friendly neighbourhood chairs to start things moving on those
> documents, and we've divided up the shepherding work.
> 
> Let's start with the list of documents, and a call for any objections:
> Please respond to this message by this Friday, 2 September, if you
> object to having the working group take on any of these documents:

Why?

At least two of these seem to be progressing nicely without any
adoption by appsawg, so adopting them seems to be a way of making
work.

Do the authors want them adopted (I have seen no requests)?

If not, who does?

Tom Petch


>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zyp-json-schema
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed
>  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kucherawy-rfc3462bis
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-mime-default-charset
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-freed-media-type-regs
> 
> Meanwhile, the first three documents we'd like to focus on are these
> (with the document's shepherd in parentheses):
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme (Jiankang)
>  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kucherawy-rfc3462bis (Barry)
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash (Alexey)
> 
> I am currently pre-approving the following document names, so the
> document editors can submit new versions under the working group's
> auspices.  The document shepherds will soon be contacting the current
> authors to discuss document editing within the working group -- note
> that working group document editors will not necessarily be the same
> as the original document authors, though we'll usually try to keep
> continuity.
> 
> draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme
>      will become
> draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme
> 
> draft-kucherawy-rfc3462bis
>      will become
> draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis
> 
> draft-saintandre-xdash
>      will become
> draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash
> 
> Once the shepherds have gotten in touch with the document editors, the
> editors should incorporate whatever comments are outstanding, and
> submit new working-group versions.  We'll then start discussing them
> in earnest, and set up milestones for when we expect to complete them.
> 
> Barry, appsawg chair
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss