Re: [apps-discuss] IRC URIs to denote users

Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> Tue, 23 September 2014 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961CA1A1AEF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSQn18cW6rHD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36591A1B0C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z11so3564251lbi.15 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=J0P0fKtiyqTo2PdK/T/7rRgKBL6s6a9fU23eRSU0zdU=; b=gOEVcHPi/I7o68vrNnVIGHM8GVYI/471yORPkOszXS8jZSTJg8oGANM61xHlpg3DRW 4UcRuWrzD9yI9MO3tVsGFwrLNkGC3Tv5r876FU6ifVfeKXwXq4jSo2URxOmEwlyOQcUM gxtAQwuKg22UiSyX75oDJT+/K+iLnu9cie0qPQzbpxWbWPfbYODcdrwRPomezKXgvWNx OdISrOXFK0ddrP5l6MiD96g678ubhST8K8I5TY1ScZClNdKjKmG+I9qDMd0jNquxnSDH 0EcyZM+gyoKTysql8jJLVow9L9QQB7dk12sCYnYwzkeV3xkf0uGPHy/srDgVwT3ysXa7 Uhtg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.161.70 with SMTP id xq6mr137533lbb.49.1411485200026; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.13.99 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gSsmLgmPuqxvOszNngYH4LtB3GedGkg43NV=CrP5V185rQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKaEYhL9PisQkN3rutxUOQyD7BFcL4W+eV_wXmj6MFePwTYbPg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN40gStjfD8jgO1+gFbCLT9XAPOYKnDES68c4DbRph6AvdSDpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKaEYhLGu3+-DcO6UrMGsPJSxpruWsc=fsM9O+qTjG7Rhrq1Sw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN40gSsmLgmPuqxvOszNngYH4LtB3GedGkg43NV=CrP5V185rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:13:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJ-aD4hKzhBtC9Ax3SORhEwz97hY=dK8T77Yd+YkcMtXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c25944f412df0503bd018c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/I3gwurCWWVZv1venPXK-TfS1euQ
Cc: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IRC URIs to denote users
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:13:24 -0000

On 23 September 2014 17:05, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Melvin,
>
> Note that the "user" production is NOT present in the IANA provisionally
> registered "irc" scheme.  I suspect you'll receive quite a lot of pushback
> from the IETF and W3C URI review lists if you want to change the syntax.
>
> I respectfully suggest that you change the scheme name for your usage
> to "ircu" (for example) to avoid all that grief (and collisions with
> existing
> "irc" scheme parsing code).
>

Thanks for the response.

My issue is that I'm not even sure this work is on any kind of standards
track.

Going back to 1996 we have:

http://www.w3.org/Addressing/draft-mirashi-url-irc-01.txt

For example.

  The URL

      irc:///Mmmm!mandar@*uoknor.edu,isnick

    references a person with nickname Mmmm, and user@host matching
    mandar@*uoknor.edu on the default IRC server.

Note: that this has been seemingly unresolved for 18 years.

My intention is to try and gather a rough consensus here, to see if there's
an obvious path to take, or an obvious path not to take, then implement
through running code, which is already working.

Minting a new URI scheme for these use case, seems perhaps overkill, but
I'm open to that suggestion.

I hope that makes sense!


>
> Cheers,
> - Ira
>
>
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
> mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
> Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
> Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 23 September 2014 01:45, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Melvin,
>>>
>>> The current IANA URI Schemes registry includes the following
>>> three schemes:
>>>
>>> irc prov/irc <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/irc> irc
>>> [Dave_Thaler
>>> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml#Dave_Thaler>
>>> ]  irc6 prov/irc6
>>> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/irc6> irc6 [
>>> Dave_Thaler
>>> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml#Dave_Thaler>
>>> ]  ircs prov/ircs
>>> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/ircs> ircs [
>>> Dave_Thaler
>>> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml#Dave_Thaler>
>>> ]
>>> All three of those are September 2012 provisional registrations
>>> (with references that include butcher and draft-mirashi-url-irc-01).
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the info!
>>
>> Both the referenced specs seem quite old.  I think there was a time when
>> Dave Thaler just put a ton of URI specs in the provisional queue, without
>> necessarily major updates.
>>
>> It's still not 100% clear what the best pattern is, if any.
>>
>> Unless there's an objection may I propose:
>>
>> irc://user@host/
>>
>> This is very much in line with the work of Ben Young (cc'd)
>>
>> http://userinfo.me/
>>
>> Who proposes a neat way to get user profile info via HTTP as:
>>
>> http://user@host/
>>
>> I believe the intention of this is to write an RFC, so I'd like to align
>> future work with that if possible
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Ira
>>>
>>>
>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
>>> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
>>> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
>>> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
>>> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
>>> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
>>> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
>>> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
>>> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
>>> mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
>>> Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
>>> Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Melvin Carvalho <
>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was wondering if IRC URIs are standardized at all?
>>>>
>>>> The latest I found was :
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-butcher-irc-url-04
>>>>
>>>> I have a use case of marking reputation from one system (web chat room)
>>>> to an IRC chat room, but I require an identifier for the user.
>>>>
>>>> The suggestions so far have been:
>>>>
>>>> irc://user@host
>>>> irc://user@host/ -- trailing slash
>>>> irc:user@host -- similar to xmpp
>>>> irc://host/#user -- fragment could be problematic as per RFC 9386
>>>>
>>>> I've gone with the second option for the moment
>>>>
>>>> Any pointers would be most welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>