IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases-02: (with DISCUSS)

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Tue, 14 July 2015 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477A51ACD3E; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8rlCoNH5K-w; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ABBF1ACD3B; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [23.241.1.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F169B22E200; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <55A512FD.3030506@seantek.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:47:41 -0700
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20150708033129.16459.55993.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKW7Yev2OaAph2Dbrp78JJSJ3tkPNKk4HWj1huNTaf6qA@mail.gmail.com> <D1C40058.647E2%terry.manderson@icann.org> <6475ED7E-017E-46CD-A1B9-2755AFC2F702@seantek.com> <CAL0qLwZE0xwzQWoxP8nZpTO_T_OkfvRc1TXUR-byiSDUXbdG3g@mail.gmail.com> <55A11ADE.1030204@dcrocker.net> <8DC2EA7C-19BC-4B01-A99F-818345AA24C3@seantek.com> <CALaySJ+MGS3kZRk=cCeFSXs0T-w6m68-EucxcHdxSFGG=izW0g@mail.gmail.com> <55A42EC4.9090002@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <55A42EC4.9090002@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms030501080608000208030104"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/JCouUPaP0LmcNaS4K1a6SJZbrmI>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:28:23 -0700
Cc: "appsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases.shepherd@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases.ad@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:48:39 -0000

On 7/13/2015 2:33 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 7/11/2015 3:06 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>> However I must also say -1 to Registration of Markdown Variants
>>>> because the document does a lot more than the registration of certain
>>>> variants.
>> Yeh, I don't think it does, unless you want to say "Description and
>> Registration ...".  And if you want to explain in the Abstract and
>> Introduction what else you're aiming at, that's fine.
>>
>
> I looked a little more at the draft.  "Use cases" is simply wrong.  I
> think "registration" is too narrow and maybe misleading.
>
> My current best guess:
>
>     Guidance on Developing and Registering Text Markdown Variants
>

"Guidance" is a good term to use.

Guidance on Markdown:
Design Philosophies, Preservation Strategies, and Select Registrations


-Sean

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email