IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 04 August 2016 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B120E12D88C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qouuogprGyAa for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A82812D89C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:57219) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1bVEqt-000XC0-ML (Exim 4.87) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:22:07 +0100
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:22:07 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160804015840.60405.qmail@ary.lan>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1608041020110.13539@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20160804015840.60405.qmail@ary.lan>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/KEQ3JIbiAJYRxq5MFZ-ZQTD5uKU>
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 09:22:18 -0000

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
> There appear to be only four protocols that have ever been used for
> SRV records: _udp, _tcp, _sctp, and _dccp.

_tls is commonly used in SIP deployments.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Wight, Portland, Plymouth: West 4 or 5, increasing 6 at times. Rough at first
in Plymouth, otherwise moderate. Showers. Good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email