Re: [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 04 August 2016 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA3312B071 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 06:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=97HRY8en; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nx9mT81q
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqPnJNErJfA8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 06:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4102112B063 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 06:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22475 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2016 13:36:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=57ca.57a344c3.k1608; bh=0eCDe9tPNesmJ7fIPFaeE9+tfL+D1Ie6OmsFeWQ+wZM=; b=97HRY8enFCHXpv6nnQrfdVYvWWpj42rWUejVjvFMW8/+gmnvRuBPDfmy+fs5zswuHkTOrXyftQj7QWfGPUu4xpEfxFqITat+uG/393uYXN3zXsM+THWtHfzYoS9un+uCqUcQsq/j/tG7MiemoTi3KjxaRzaMVITE6P0kwwSg/dzZfOkprN/qIiEr+yH09aWh4kjf9JLj2lQBUn+5NxHvHSFqewkAcsYbsJ44Vj5qFfPK6L9cldPr1k3tOpwWMaFV
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=57ca.57a344c3.k1608; bh=0eCDe9tPNesmJ7fIPFaeE9+tfL+D1Ie6OmsFeWQ+wZM=; b=nx9mT81q2YzvcQXNmFSk7WJp5ojPaYuHtJLtp93klTIdQ0B/mlj11Zr8VhOHQfVtlIObTgWhXZdEckI5+SRFV4GZ2n2f6CwO5RFBlT7LJVTwyZemfcXSnsoySydmF64q7kx2sBkdaEj0UFp/x0UZviX+kGwQw6dqiBeNYXm9GKUe36jsRg68KBwBPVM+x0jrg/LuCY2S7AY3rieQ4sbHPd3Qqg08ZmIibD2PZLanCtZYdg9ROj9ktLKhro4LEgvW
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 04 Aug 2016 13:36:03 -0000
Date: 4 Aug 2016 09:36:01 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1608040934590.12423@ary.lan>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Tony Finch" <dot@dotat.at>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1608041020110.13539@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20160804015840.60405.qmail@ary.lan> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1608041020110.13539@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/pGKdpe4V2chMRTVtMjF99ejUvwg>
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:36:05 -0000

>> There appear to be only four protocols that have ever been used for
>> SRV records: _udp, _tcp, _sctp, and _dccp.
>
> _tls is commonly used in SIP deployments.

Huh.  The only place I see _tls in an RFC is as an example in the DIAMETER 
spec in RFC 6733.

I believe you, but once again we have the question about what to do with 
stuff seen in the wild that's not actually defined anywhere.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.