IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] R: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt> (APPSDIR review)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 09 April 2013 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D6421F9814; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXSbQPiUEsHE; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFA021F97E7; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.142.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r39JwZkW002050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1365537530; bh=XPQhi/UzwEcHf0ucKeHF9M92R7Z52WQ4bu/FZV7/BMw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=T8fEYyhh5nUm7bIAPBb71Ho7uZCpgi/bUStrRgm1XFsI84g07uY2aF6z3aC4e1Pth LSXGHai5g+2+S4AS4LmnermZ2KhdgnNCkFLlMvrin2+BJ13i+xZkeRW/ni/b81rq28 PoNRu7r9xF5cSBc0PNVvKFXSqWeN1ZzptNrSXClY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1365537530; i=@elandsys.com; bh=XPQhi/UzwEcHf0ucKeHF9M92R7Z52WQ4bu/FZV7/BMw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=oSS3jGaLWIPHM0HZ8yurSgzMZMenqJiiPlfhNX9Qxfshv8J3VQSb/p+DrVNrNewHM 4K4NY6VGm+0HIMQskJIiSH476wAUQ0kqGuj5scBlKJHPAzLPo8kVqKPvPxzZJqH4jy H1q90i6aYr8CbuKicuCkyQQPtRtacyzZB7kd/fGA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130409084702.0c6104b8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:10:18 -0700
To: Salvatore D'Antonio <salvatore.dantonio@uniparthenope.it>, draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech.all@tools.ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <005701ce3538$8f0b3480$ad219d80$@dantonio@uniparthenope.it>
References: <20130401072846.32360.9502.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5162C44B.5030904@cisco.com> <005701ce3538$8f0b3480$ad219d80$@dantonio@uniparthenope.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ipfix@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] R: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt> (APPSDIR review)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:58:54 -0000

Hi Salvatore,
At 08:40 09-04-2013, Salvatore D'Antonio wrote:
>-          The sentence "The registry can be updated when 
>specifications of the new  technique(s) and any new Information 
>Elements are provided." has been removed since it did not clarify 
>how the registry will be managed.

This is a follow-up to the APPSDIR review of 
draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg09239.html )

 From Section 9.1.1 of draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-15:

   "New assignments for the registry will be administered
    by IANA and are subject to Expert Review [RFC5226]."

draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-15 defines a sub-registry.  It 
does not provide any relevant details about the sub-registry.  What 
documentation is required and which criteria will be used for 
assignments in the new sub-registry?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email