Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 14 November 2011 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C2B11E823C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:09:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22KMu0GNGVfX for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6B011E8240 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ggnr5 with SMTP id r5so624810ggn.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:09:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VWi1XtygNQlqnQzgmhYpMJAn9nqxyKwM6x1bBL41qe4=; b=ffzeBr1LmL5iFv0qnNVBT+LfRtmIWPgJVdcZAWMlX2NpIlWSlOy1xx+HnbxtgMTybM gcl8jRVz/dFCVu66Dos05Z5dN3vlAKqP/b7ktaf2mE0xnUgLe9IRZRr4vKqkomYw0/t7 qiuC1wxGGytzzVO3+R7xXkSmMHGG5QK9Gi9SM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.146.34.4 with SMTP id h4mr1608390yah.16.1321254569317; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.146.250.14 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:09:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EC0BBEE.4050201@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <201111140546.pAE5k1aW035215@medusa.blackops.org> <4EC0B043.2060907@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15012@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4EC0BBEE.4050201@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:09:29 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _9uxU8OwgzpdRczcuM-aDWfqEfI
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDjCAvdSCzX+vMmP7+zxkE2FmEww_MPGR4r3WuZG6D0-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:09:31 -0000

> Actually, the fact that the "scope" extension is in-scope should be
> mentioned before the list of scope exclusions, it shouldn't be included as a
> side-effect of the exclusions.

I have this image of a bunch of Vikings in a Monty Python sketch, all
sitting around chanting, "Scope, scope, scope, scope, scope, scope,
scope, scope...."

Barry