Re: [apps-discuss] request to register 'describes' link relation (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-describes-link-01)

[James M Snell <[e-mail]>]

Ok... given that I just rev'd the draft and that's a pretty editorial
change, let's hold off on that one until the final edit. I'd say this one
is pretty much done and ready for a last call. Assuming everything goes
through with that, I can make that section number change in the
templates...

- James

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:

> > Sticking my hand up and hoping to get some similar treatment for:
> >
> >   http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-additional-link-relations-05.txt
> >
> > This one has been there for a while. I followed the same advice you just
> > gave dret and changed it to informational and cleaned up the normative
> > references. Pretty basic draft.
>
> Indeed.  I suggest that you change the references in each template to
> include the section number -- not that the document is long enough to
> really matter, but I very much like the cleanliness of it.  For
> example:
>
>    o  Relation Name: about
>    o  Description: Refers to a resource that is the subject of the
>       link's context.
>    o  Reference: This specification, Section 2.
>
> Link-relations folk, consider this a formal request for review of the
> five relations in the above draft.  After comments here, I'll send the
> document out for IETF last call.
>
> Barry
>