IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-media-type

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 12 August 2014 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1CE1A0780 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdhGT3Irq0Yk for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egssmtp02.att.com (egssmtp02.att.com [144.160.128.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C1E1A0271 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp02.att.com ( EGS R6 8.14.5 TLS/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7C3MKTX023329 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:22:21 -0700
Received: from vpn-135-70-101-18.vpn.swst.att.com ([135.70.101.18]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140812032220gw100j0cr9e>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 03:22:20 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.101.18]
Message-ID: <53E9888F.9090906@att.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 23:22:55 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <64A70A8D-E82B-4269-B243-6A5DA98AEB56@standardstrack.com> <20140721195032.7791.qmail@joyce.lan> <01PAFXOJO2QQ007ZXF@mauve.mrochek.com> <20140722170739.174919sctur0hbwg@webmail.tuffmail.net> <CAL0qLwZQefg75bdcH5pxm0ipGdT4AUMOhMEuo70Kg_01yxs9fA@mail.gmail.com> <53E8FDF7.4060203@att.com> <01PB9LMH5SXU0000SM@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01PB9LMH5SXU0000SM@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/PE_IFuR1T4YtiJUYN3cGvp0rPps
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-media-type
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 03:22:22 -0000

On 8/11/14, 10:53 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
>
>> For registering the media type, Informational status should be
>> sufficient. It's not standardizing the format; just registering the
>> media type.
>
> Agreed. If, however, the document ends up expanding to include some 
> sort of
> shared base syntax (I'm not saying it should or will, but let's 
> suppose), then
> there's a case to be made for proposed.

I would write that as "If >>and only if<< ..." :-)

     Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email