IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-media-type

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Mon, 11 August 2014 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34F71A0037 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HtfHWeDUamrD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egssmtp02.att.com (egssmtp02.att.com [144.160.128.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44DAF1A0027 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp02.att.com ( EGS R6 8.14.5 TLS/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7BHV2NZ022221 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:31:02 -0700
Received: from ds135-91-110-222.dhcps.ugn.att.com ([135.91.110.222]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140811173100gw100j0cqve>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:31:01 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.91.110.222]
Message-ID: <53E8FDF7.4060203@att.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:31:35 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <64A70A8D-E82B-4269-B243-6A5DA98AEB56@standardstrack.com> <20140721195032.7791.qmail@joyce.lan> <01PAFXOJO2QQ007ZXF@mauve.mrochek.com> <20140722170739.174919sctur0hbwg@webmail.tuffmail.net> <CAL0qLwZQefg75bdcH5pxm0ipGdT4AUMOhMEuo70Kg_01yxs9fA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZQefg75bdcH5pxm0ipGdT4AUMOhMEuo70Kg_01yxs9fA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070808070105000207050703"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/vsfVnOM1tMYB1nFwCwRdrim3TdI
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-seantek-text-markdown-media-type
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:31:04 -0000

On 8/4/14, 2:12 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com 
> <mailto:dev+ietf@seantek.com>> wrote:
>
>     Just wanted to add some observations that I made at the APPSAWG
>     presentation:
>
>
> While reviewing our open calls for adoption, I just noticed that this 
> document currently requests Informational status.  Why not Proposed 
> Standard?

For registering the media type, Informational status should be 
sufficient. It's not standardizing the format; just registering the 
media type.

     Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email