IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB33D21E8024 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9b+xRtfHrv6r for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA421E800E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::e82a:4f80:7f44:eaf7%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:12:47 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHM8ZI/NfjHLgzFXkyZMIHKh9XCxJZKvjfggB+V/gCAAHr7gP//iy+g
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:12:47 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392808B3A5@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120222184536.6635.42117.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928042C26@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392808B2F9@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F60FB31.80209@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F60FB31.80209@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:12:48 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc@dcrocker.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 1:10 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt
> 
> I think the general form of this is:
> 
>     7.  Greylisting SHOULD NOT be applied by an ADMD's submission
> service (see
> [SUBMISSION]) for authenticated client hosts.  Authentication can
> include whatever mechanisms are deemed appropriate for the ADMD, such
> as known internal IP addresses, SASL or the like.
> 
> The "alternately" is confusing to me.  Is it meant to apply to non-
> submission services?  If so, then this rule needs something broader,
> such as:
> 
>     7.  Greylisting SHOULD NOT be applied to client hosts internal to
> the ADMD or otherwise part of the ADMD's operation, such as having
> membership on a list of exempt IP Addresses.

I think your first restatement is more what I had in mind.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email