Re: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 26 January 2011 02:52 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5679A3A687E for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71GMbPgDDy3F for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0183A6847 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iyi42 with SMTP id 42so6383623iyi.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:55:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SKxNAii3klxYA/eOO8ramFNNEyrtqqQFY1o9U21FVos=; b=ggXral+I6gBofTUC9ETdIxX+eRZPjjFSklGyXWkX4BLFx3YOUY7I8e/n7I7p4y00lR R0Wn+TIlkLJLH4wWEE2DIeKDYZl3au6E3kPoK5sef/QnAvd288lFZrlwTbvXlPd1dFng fJK9/7JbYFrBNPjm/mQHggVuxnq10h0ZT/YgA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=YANSTeeQTTL/LP/bqgdOrvOQndllhG/xamBsXbSvHPT24fNXF0+FochdD2FtVw8F74 oHrLKtWtYsKhIEy1ix1ZyD+WyP/ZqdnbLoFZ0gZ8kXArcv5ZcLGcOIkyYXn1Zp3u5d2a njheEbMSgZ1hcOyelyoq/3KMEKsq1iFEaOpIo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.220.4 with SMTP id hw4mr7631579icb.420.1296010515811; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:55:15 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.42.227.193 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:55:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8F92F7CF-7482-4DEA-86F3-7D4965A616B8@mnot.net>
References: <AANLkTim=ML4Aytds_R97Mr=4=yxmRPHwRzF7H49TZwRK@mail.gmail.com> <8F92F7CF-7482-4DEA-86F3-7D4965A616B8@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:55:15 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7-RSGKGo9k_3zMkVz7SWUmI7Urg
Message-ID: <AANLkTikitqdE49FWm2i_DWPdaPAEGXrU-pCmQ15XG8Yv@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] For consideration as an appsawg document: draft-nottingham-http-portal
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 02:52:17 -0000

> However, some implementation experience is necessary. In particular, I'd like to
> run an experiment where the status code is deployed on a captive portal in a large
> network, to see if it affects current implementations.

That might mean that the target status of the document should, for
now, be "experimental".  The best way to get some experiments going,
and to drive some experimental implementations, is to have an
experimental spec.

> The IETF meeting network seems like an ideal place to do so, and I've pinged
> ietf-management@ietf.org (last August) about doing so, but haven't had any
> response.

Try sending Joel a note (he responded to your other query on the wgchairs list).

Barry