Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for November 2011

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 30 November 2011 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C119221F8922 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:10:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlPDcuZKvMdm for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5BE21F8A6C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:10:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1592422DB; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:17:28 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4ED6A9D5.8030508@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:10:29 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20111129224036.0acba060@elandnews.com> <4ED67B02.8000903@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20111130124511.09e20708@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111130124511.09e20708@elandnews.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for November 2011
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:10:32 -0000

On 11/30/11 2:03 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> At 10:50 30-11-2011, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> Just to clarify: Though we are shutting down the review team, we are
>> reconstituting as an Apps Directorate. Reviews are not going away.
> 
> Please note that the reviews will still be semi-formal.
> 
> I would like to get some feedback from authors and other subscribers
> about the previous reviews.  Please send me your comments off-list.  I
> would like to know what you didn't like, what could be improved, etc.

To choose the most recent example, Bill's review of
draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-openid was very helpful to me -- in my IESG
ballot position I could simply reference it (I'm completing my own
further review, too, but it was great to have a strong review to point
at). I would expect that if IETF folks do future work with OpenID, we'll
be able to build upon his comments as needed.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/