Re: [apps-discuss] a new web security list

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 17 February 2011 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270FE3A6CE3 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWjUnkRER4NZ for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1BE3A6DC3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-185.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-185.cisco.com [64.101.72.185]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCAF340327; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:23:58 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D5D9BB6.2070408@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:05:42 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <4D5D922A.8000508@stpeter.im> <4D5D9B46.40003@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D5D9B46.40003@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms000806040106080201020806"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] a new web security list
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:05:14 -0000

On 2/17/11 3:03 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/17/2011 1:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Folks, a dedicated list has been established for discussion about
>> requirements and potential implementation of JSON to provide security
>> services for Web-based applications. You can subscribe here:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
> 
> 
> It's almost refreshing to see a healthy anticipation of resistance from
> potential participants.
> 
> I assume that accounts for the second word in the acronym:
> 
>> Web Objection Encryption and Signatures (WOES)

That's classic! I'll blame the Security Area ADs. ;-)