IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-levine-application-gzip-01.txt

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Sun, 15 April 2012 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5632721F886A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bc+rTSNie9se for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C94321F86D3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OECMGTOK1S018TB4@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OE0NBOM18G00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01OECMGS7U9800ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:09:09 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:33:46 +0000" <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204141621250.94187@joyce.lan>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format="flowed"
References: <20120414141741.69972.qmail@joyce.lan> <A66F1731667F902A3BE63855@PST.JCK.COM> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204141621250.94187@joyce.lan>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-levine-application-gzip-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:10:00 -0000

It occurs to me that the new media types registration process allows a
registration to list deprecated type name aliases for the type. Seems to me
we might want to take advantage of that.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email