[apps-discuss] Review of draft-levine-application-gzip-01.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B844121F850D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.522, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vl0CCcXSJNrG for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F5921F853B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1334057547; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=RKLZb5Z9bW7LXiLbyYPij8fYqHr+bnXoyw94Ay77vmg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=R1xuUHah7Vv999OT5vSevB59+ENiK7scCC/0VOtkXCHb41LkgccPi5F+8MkM2dYFRztm5X /dR/nqlD611hOQjEiz83A71Pi+0aiOPxQwYXw/Juv0PVq9DrWak5JV4OlAh11HyjDrX/7p C2uSn27nlEOK7jchpa90vjyjMcJbDME=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T4QaSAAg25YU@rufus.isode.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:32:26 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F841156.6030908@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:54:14 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: John Levine <standards@taugh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-levine-application-gzip-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:34:24 -0000

Hi John,
I am sorry I've missed this document earlier.

I am generally happy that you wrote this draft and support its 
publication. Having said that, I think it needs some changes:

In Section 1:

    Some applications have informally used the media type application/
    x-gzip.  The media types defined in this document should replace that
    media type in future applications.

Also I've seen application/x-gzip-compressed being mentioned on the web.

But I think it would be better to wait for 
draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-04 to be submitted to IESG (it is in 
the APPSAWG WGLC now). That document would relax restrictions on 
registering x-* media types. I think your document should register media 
types already in use, as changing existing implementations to use 
application/gzip is hopeless at this point, unless there is some 
evidence that application/gzip is also in use. In the latter case 
aliasing mechanism proposed in draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs should 
be used.

3.1.  Regsistration Details

    Person and email address to contact for further information: see
    http://www.gzip.net/

I've just tried this URI and I am getting "this domain is for sale". It 
doesn't look like this is a good stable reference.

5. References

This Section should be named "Normative References".

Nit: spot typos in names of Sections 2.1 and 3.1.