IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thaler-uri-scheme-reg-ps-00.txt

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 10 October 2013 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C122121F9B08 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.822
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.822 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.777, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKUkyOiyIBxd for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625C121F9BF3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.13.136]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LzGV3-1VqPh80IZl-014RFW for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:47:03 +0200
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:47:04 +0200
Message-ID: <7mid59tid3u4apv460egn4an94h1mre6a6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <20131010144721.30339.98848.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7e12b97cac364127b5ab56574eecf627@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <c4gd591k17rvsrcn0prrafkudknqsbaahl@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <23c10ed0337840bd91fb413e9160a4d0@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <23c10ed0337840bd91fb413e9160a4d0@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:v3spWucBTCFmOKJml30+kKNDZxwaNn4WHPJQsjagmg3TwJShHr6 +oNaXzsOkEoHijqZVzNoIt1EXnproNZShHPQldfFyLtkVjhnBtKCnsG2RGnsAx5CA9vSHIW KEQOFod3toJUbHRJVuY8bU7/piQraD1+R6DPsY48gNCxgOxEVMz1R9wRZqe9TmdlFhYVIOy PY0Y+c7L+amqknmNbV3rw==
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thaler-uri-scheme-reg-ps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:47:10 -0000

* Dave Thaler wrote:
>> In section 2.1 you write "What if all new applications being submitted to an
>> app store started sending requests for Provisional URI schemes?"

>As noted elsewhere in the doc, it's unlikely since there's little/no incentive
>to register anyway.

>I'd say that ship has already sailed.  If you want to suggest a solution, by all means
>write a draft.  This document is just the problem statement.

Let me put it differently. I do not understand how the question quoted
above is useful in understanding the problem the document is stating.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email