IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Tue, 25 October 2011 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1503221F8B75 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.135, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qp4nbm9A7g1r for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7033E21F8AFB for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1319561727; x=1351097727; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4EA6E9E2.2080308@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Tu e,=2025=20Oct=202011=2011:54:58=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20"Murray=20S.=20Kucherawy"=20<m sk@cloudmark.com>|CC:=20"apps-discuss@ietf.org"=20<apps-d iscuss@ietf.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20[apps-discuss]=20I-D=20 Action:=20draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt |References:=20<20111018191615.13760.71231.idtracker@ietf a.amsl.com>=09<CADBvc98iHh4Nk4S0ipkSs3ATKTVBM_qALM9gGApj5 gaW27t4nQ@mail.gmail.com>=09<01O7EEVR67JU00RCTX@mauve.mro chek.com>=20<F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14B3F@E XCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<F5833273385BB3 4F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14B3F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1" =3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.48.1]; bh=TQkk8KVxXecnRkwJwisGzlDf7SnjKWE5GHNZ3+HYMGg=; b=p+tFRBG9rgvGsIcLXgHa1esk+TUBBVx4vjvwXy87OpiYEFx+gG+B7DJl VDWYWBuxXpUC8E7t7n+JT8iqITydqlFtof3/iwd1YurPL8h7U5N8iXRr4 Xl4VsxBH+AUJ/OrSLEso+7WQ58kbt2dfbGfdeY802s9Ng7JvVZ15PXoa1 Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6509"; a="130628835"
Received: from ironmsg03-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.17]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2011 09:55:26 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,404,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="148592642"
Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.2]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 25 Oct 2011 09:55:26 -0700
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:55:06 -0700
Message-ID: <4EA6E9E2.2080308@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:54:58 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <20111018191615.13760.71231.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADBvc98iHh4Nk4S0ipkSs3ATKTVBM_qALM9gGApj5gaW27t4nQ@mail.gmail.com> <01O7EEVR67JU00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14B3F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14B3F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:55:28 -0000

On 10/19/11 1:39 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg69885.html
>>>        
>> ...the applicability of the two maturity level stuff to this effort is for the IESG to sort out.
>>      
> Concur on all points.
>    

The IESG is of the opinion that this should go for the new "Internet 
Standard" designation. That means running a new, 4-week, last call. I 
will initiate that tomorrow unless I hear yelps of horror from the WG. 
If I do hear such yelps, you had better give me an argument to bring 
back to the IESG that I can defend.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email