Re: [apps-discuss] And another question
Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Thu, 23 May 2013 20:32 UTC
Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B10021F977D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VGN+bz8CutY9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1104221F977E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.15.0-1) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id d537e915.0.353747.00-296.991995.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Thu, 23 May 2013 19:51:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 519e735e0081eee5-64672da4b0a76fe484b205b604499a97685dea1f
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4NJpvpa014770 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 15:51:57 -0400
Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4NJppm4014725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 15:51:52 -0400
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 19:51:38 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4NJpcQi006350 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 15:51:38 -0400
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4NJpZlJ006287 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 15:51:35 -0400
Received: from [135.70.84.245] (vpn-135-70-84-245.vpn.swst.att.com[135.70.84.245]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20130523195134gw1008e016e> (Authid: tony); Thu, 23 May 2013 19:51:35 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.84.245]
Message-ID: <519E7346.6060909@att.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:51:34 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <CALcybBAKi3w=tP7-3JqhXBb-W5uDgm6s7F7StYe8=FJM9UbLFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALcybBAKi3w=tP7-3JqhXBb-W5uDgm6s7F7StYe8=FJM9UbLFg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=QO3fsH3L c=1 sm=0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=CcG6VjeJWIQA:10 a=bfzWQn4VrGAA:10 a=SMb7TJcE3iUA:10 a=ofM]
X-AnalysisOut: [gfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=zQP7CpK]
X-AnalysisOut: [OAAAA:8 a=c1igK0EI_n8A:10 a=W3zItJJVKYmmaqm_DUoA:9 a=wPNLv]
X-AnalysisOut: [fGTeEIA:10]
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] And another question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:32:54 -0000
On 5/23/2013 12:59 PM, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Another question is about handling empty _keys_ in an associative
> array. Is this legal at all? Empty values are allowed, they obviously
> have a use (a query parameter can be empty for instance), but what
> about (written as a JSON Object):
>
> {
> "foo": "",
> "": "bar"
> }
>
> ?
This looks perfectly legal to me.
Tony Hansen
- Re: [apps-discuss] And another question Tony Hansen
- [apps-discuss] URI Template: how is the erratum p… Francis Galiegue
- Re: [apps-discuss] And another question Francis Galiegue