IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Retroactive application of draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg - comprehensive review

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Thu, 16 April 2015 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AE41B36A3; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zhi4gLKzEa6u; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0130.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C171B36A4; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) by BY2PR03MB410.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.136.17; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:39:10 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0136.026; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:39:10 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Thread-Topic: Retroactive application of draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg - comprehensive review
Thread-Index: AQHQbLK+cqpU3jvXIEilgc+GV25Eep1DivsAgAFCK4CACz7BgIAAGL2AgAADAoCAAAmY4A==
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:39:10 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB41274DFE1D73A8B649F4A57A3E40@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2E49FA112B054FFAED69D8A1@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CALaySJ+JdE5YrBuXv343_CfNP4mYxOR94JV4q_Uso4VoWfD=Ng@mail.gmail.com> <723FBC93979E1019101319C5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CALaySJL-QbQ7rMRmBHTCjNbjUMKdrHrNSBLZ5zyVQ69VvXMu3A@mail.gmail.com> <AB0D76A4BFEEA77B7878126E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CALaySJ+4STYA1YDeUKVTLj7FXCcTSo1W_kRTf2Vc-VSQnke22w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+4STYA1YDeUKVTLj7FXCcTSo1W_kRTf2Vc-VSQnke22w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: computer.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [131.107.192.62]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB410;
x-o365ent-eop-header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB410837F70DDB70CBD4D701DA3E40@BY2PR03MB410.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(77096005)(46102003)(106116001)(76576001)(86362001)(86612001)(102836002)(2656002)(230783001)(93886004)(77156002)(87936001)(50986999)(54356999)(76176999)(2950100001)(92566002)(99286002)(40100003)(74316001)(62966003)(4001410100001)(2900100001)(33656002)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB410; H:BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010); SRVR:BY2PR03MB410; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB410;
x-forefront-prvs: 0548586081
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Apr 2015 20:39:10.4285 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB410
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/zoNL5Y84Sn3T3Zovmn9EnimKzUU>
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg.all@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Retroactive application of draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg - comprehensive review
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:39:15 -0000

Barry Leiba writes:
> I think the answer is that this document does not update 3986, and does not
> intend to impose new requirements.  I think the controversies are purely
> about 3986, and not about what this document is doing.
> 
> I will wait for confirmation of that from a document author or two...
> or refutation of it from anyone who thinks I'm wrong about where this
> document sits.

I agree with Barry and above matches what I've previously stated on the list.

Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email