IETF Logo Mail Archive

[aqm] status of codel WGLC

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0295112B6FC for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PForaCxiOzGF for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6997E12B3A7 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id t7so13047684qkh.2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IVxrJx4li5Yv22FDrU2aadc7H0S0x5ROcRHMD5zwuZw=; b=qg6I07e3lgM/X+7t6WR1HVWMCl4OSH7Fpgrr0wA3Opq5UoCBRzc+g9P+KBtRLrXV4O SV0utqWbjDSGZ68JhjS+T/rwchq/5ao0W4w8X3WaQ0T/fO1E/ywlsSTve3PqkasWckhB 1UDxewKDRcktfLBlQ0Hfb8q1RhajKG6sHWWVj8PFdU/t1eTp48UXcCKit2zt12QVh6/y huz69NcgNu6/Cax+X2iFo3qTDWSiJKh30sH3egpI1dTiBG/2CLt1XAhsl/kKj0zQUoBa wcIwUa8l+qeXzRaHN0cbRE7MZ/WWB6IC9JuTjxrXi6yaDk0rxOOB4Nnz68PMfBsJ0BYq z0vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IVxrJx4li5Yv22FDrU2aadc7H0S0x5ROcRHMD5zwuZw=; b=Yi2JWPywbnGScxiv6C0bxgN+qRkupn1KQKljtfJatBQMJXfC3bi91fXPRCa2cgHpWu vEUjz4svyV/P714MZz5C3avJhSka6jyOpoI7TANW8r58h7dTm8nhPFvU6zNyXJk91O4t 83VNVu+fE+Iq2GxiRPkTKlCHJTMx9TEu6I2/8ScLsRrVMgt0mN6Qj8TEWFtzT175rZLK w/VR1HTYSc8GQRC3NgoaLw+pXOp5Wre2w4u+xV97Rj46P0/K7KBakf4Y06AewlCTTbx8 5FCKIBQu8MrdjUmO1wL3HVgF7DynyXMMY2IAE3/MCMx8xHP51gED9TsYKFiLM0Bq7Nze 7twA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOb21zb8XZxHc4GRjNG8i4eVttYv45cBxp+4cA5auyDmtRou9ZKOhbjvSscnT5WiA==
X-Received: by 10.55.175.1 with SMTP id y1mr2927105qke.150.1473859578140; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2603:3003:2d01:5600:81fe:f53a:3ca3:25e7? ([2603:3003:2d01:5600:81fe:f53a:3ca3:25e7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d73sm2190336qke.45.2016.09.14.06.26.17 for <aqm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <539103ec-b357-b44f-bff4-1ab5e0ae7ee4@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:26:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/1fY6-CTD7faEkeCsvDa3jO1Simk>
Subject: [aqm] status of codel WGLC
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:08:45 -0000

Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some 
comments were received, and the authors made an update some time ago.  
There hasn't been much follow-up discussion.  I assume this means the 
current draft meets people's expectations?  If not, now is a good time 
to shout, because I'm working on the shepherd write-up so that it can be 
submitted to the IESG soon.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/

There are a few small things I noticed while doing the shepherd write-up:

1) I thought the ADs and WG were happy to go Experimental rather than 
Informational 
(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/current/msg01727.html ) ... 
was there a reason from the authors that it didn't change?

2) Idnits has some minor issues 
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/current/msg01727.html

     a) it doesn't like the reference "[CODEL2012]" in the abstract

     b) for referencing RFC 896, there's inconsistent "RFC896" vs 
"RFC0896" (use the zero or don't, but it should match)

     c) the "[CMNTS]" reference is unused

     d) some of the obsolete references should be checked.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email