Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC

"Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu> Fri, 30 September 2016 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C28F12B2A9 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 03:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5KPXgzqnkiha for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 03:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D9F12B29C for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 03:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.71.26] helo=i72vorta.tm.kit.edu) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25 iface 141.3.10.81 id 1bpvUi-0004Ia-Cw; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:56:44 +0200
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by i72vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC87AB0009E; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:56:45 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
References: <539103ec-b357-b44f-bff4-1ab5e0ae7ee4@mti-systems.com> <bfb77883-aded-6751-9b21-c014b1046201@kit.edu> <CAGD1bZZk=9VH1OgdQf7N6XGMUhcA5jmy0DZoWb9CCvjNkqbKxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Message-ID: <496d5416-1654-ae0f-87fd-7e6dc4939dde@kit.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:56:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGD1bZZk=9VH1OgdQf7N6XGMUhcA5jmy0DZoWb9CCvjNkqbKxA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1475233004.
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/N2sOU28a5XjZepiN0t6onahojnQ>
Cc: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@google.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:56:49 -0000

Hi Jana,

Am 29.09.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Jana Iyengar:
> There are two issues in that email:
> 1. The importance of reentering state. This is clearly a matter for
> evaluation, and further evaluation will surely yield more results. We
> cannot and won't be perfect in this draft, but I encourage further
> evaluation and work that can perhaps even lead to a future update to
> this draft. We don't intend to address this point in the draft.

I think that wasn't the issue. The issue was that the text should
actually reflect the importance of reentering dropping state by
giving the explanations from the code snippet also in the text.
It's ok if you then also point out that this needs more experimentation
etc.

> 2. Consistency of drop_next_. We should be consistent, this was an
> oversight. We'll fix the algorithm to be consistent with the text.

Fine!

Regards,
 Roland