IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 29 September 2016 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5860512B1D0 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vHSPw4Adhuv for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C4012B20A for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r192so184743891ita.0 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1mg7P/fD12v6nZ3OLG+ha3rbe5qYuZNSUw6EuD3bmCE=; b=U1ixk/5wV2Q81KmD6tB3ASDoWmHGhlYvmI+T10BGe1dK05f3n+uvzbUX49zr8ufQgv djpMD6JbyAK9krCi/PddF2Vw3FGUyi8V3SyZXO5+XC5je+v8aRkSBi8PpiRNF7CGmJEQ mFE2CpXOaynrRLU5temJnlt2iELiGZpZhWk56MVIBzeEWRJy0MnXqkITgtsKiryGeEfY oru3fFXS3zE54h16oWCOH5SCEeDdFX+2dJ9NkdA+lrbzgO2O9CkpsSe1jxlUhFCbFuN8 pbHOH27N7aa262gAtr8ERRmkfrx9WkfxaJiqxiG3Qb0pBqzbwB62YPs6odIc//vAaGSa fL0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1mg7P/fD12v6nZ3OLG+ha3rbe5qYuZNSUw6EuD3bmCE=; b=kah8e8a+AklOZWrdiO5u9pxJGtbYW0UASTz8KA9Wd7+6BH7SH+R7KOJClzbiRrtXio E7C26nRoVe/nQ5KHpDdGAfHHb2ucJQxZxXSzIMvmhfxW2BsiKefqKNjLpum02K96hKgw J2dpTPWs1Pn75PS3Z/bOWMJrUoeNgQz2QHOFuB6XBxok1hb28TgzvsnQYOxCgwt3hBft mchqSa5EkhjDSa8gOTgGedxeJHzQ5oOOoroFHpKtVBsgCud2HvEtVUB4mPWHS5m5hf4L Sv6N+79h5uV7Je2oc6MhQW7JoEhp1BZ6c3okaoI6Bj6z8Z3I/TYZT3JLekShD2ku6oqG OAXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkuuIfMooR860ecbVAC8jie0XvV1jN3b5m3pP61gmHaYrQ277GnG6VVXQFdtm6apw==
X-Received: by 10.107.39.76 with SMTP id n73mr4655268ion.180.1475168723239; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (cpe-76-188-215-129.neo.res.rr.com. [76.188.215.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n69sm2972488ita.0.2016.09.29.10.05.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>, "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>
References: <539103ec-b357-b44f-bff4-1ab5e0ae7ee4@mti-systems.com> <bfb77883-aded-6751-9b21-c014b1046201@kit.edu> <CAGD1bZZk=9VH1OgdQf7N6XGMUhcA5jmy0DZoWb9CCvjNkqbKxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <108c371e-bccb-fbf6-d3e1-33cb0e665d0b@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:05:19 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGD1bZZk=9VH1OgdQf7N6XGMUhcA5jmy0DZoWb9CCvjNkqbKxA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------02A408BF81F3B1D36B5D51CA"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/u_wg-L1GqvLXsPQT0fOtnD-3otk>
Cc: Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@google.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:06:43 -0000

In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9 
(or other suitable place).  Since we want to encourage wide 
experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about what some of the 
open questions/topics are.



On 9/29/2016 12:29 PM, Jana Iyengar wrote:
> Hi Wes, Roland,
>
> There are two issues in that email:
> 1. The importance of reentering state. This is clearly a matter for 
> evaluation, and further evaluation will surely yield more results. We 
> cannot and won't be perfect in this draft, but I encourage further 
> evaluation and work that can perhaps even lead to a future update to 
> this draft. We don't intend to address this point in the draft.
> 2. Consistency of drop_next_. We should be consistent, this was an 
> oversight. We'll fix the algorithm to be consistent with the text.
>
> We'll send out a revised draft early next week.
> - jana
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Bless, Roland (TM) 
> <roland.bless@kit.edu <mailto:roland.bless@kit.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Wes and all,
>
>     Am 14.09.2016 um 15:26 schrieb Wesley Eddy:
>     > Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
>     > comments were received, and the authors made an update some time
>     ago.
>     > There hasn't been much follow-up discussion.  I assume this
>     means the
>     > current draft meets people's expectations?  If not, now is a
>     good time
>     > to shout, because I'm working on the shepherd write-up so that
>     it can be
>     > submitted to the IESG soon.
>
>     No, still some issues that were raised here:
>     https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/ENA1VZmcFVXCJWrMIbmey4wAYnw
>     <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/ENA1VZmcFVXCJWrMIbmey4wAYnw>
>
>     that are not fixed yet.
>     I pointed that out at the mic within the AQM session @IETF96.
>     Andrew said that they need to do the changes and then resubmit.
>
>     Regards,
>      Roland
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     aqm mailing list
>     aqm@ietf.org <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email