IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] centralization

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sun, 14 March 2021 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264903A12AF for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtY5XEqKL7wF for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 704163A12AD for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id c10so61775215ejx.9 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wdvOkjnx21TfSpL9jMPgrO52/bV4ycnOim9+6ueo7Dc=; b=YjdqCiPK6oeDI3Q3THCjNQSMmVzFITLmY5sjmm3HunDleHi2dgOOVILq78eQdCvp0p PJzb6GYU15qVPuTrPt2yxMYcDa8kbpBbb+5VjEaoMw5zNiqucAodI5XTO75LwxHWzD1X jAVhrk1+Oo8JXCqyamT2BGtBWfzXewXXy8GLpDl+Kj3KDVmCSDcIbXcxlA57/o9sAKN1 cIt8xuVTJRzXXM2wvGQuFL9Z+D5arOBpKOH/0Lv6GR3zz5T/xVOSSI4u5E/rGRuzlIow M4a+C7mn5JtkG6+sKutNpMXRTwFHWKWByHH8enHdU5tAxT+V0hu1g92GgoE6EvjWgaUk xEFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wdvOkjnx21TfSpL9jMPgrO52/bV4ycnOim9+6ueo7Dc=; b=thYPXDWe7yumEY0HorzwHZkRBY39IGNOcyg5Zy1U5Gc/wPHEC0HrEeTuKSSJfjRx13 DQ0CsphJF+ILHwuTBNbwiMT9/InpIYaygKZDU1YL1IheIMnC/gDmup17rwF00b7e/wvT oKnonqKwNgvRkNO2fEPgqPqLbvmY3PrEGPS0pBncucQFVvvIgvFVRi9DP8jmaOo16WKP fr6+3/eMkrN9LkSV0IXw1jNKPDLHGB4GimuGJQ/nr4Ps90VsrD0HJJHM4yhZcfNIVkoJ yF7i9X1XiX+qgCmrHwy/PqYugKrGMGCdOXg09z5pxuFqnPjug0mfAfcg8CARHyMARjtq Ed0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nsn6wFFEyQzF3f7nFYauNvH2xF34PoVh4PeA3707RTGDHNVjR 5MM0KWbxTPhGmWmIsCtF6Y8zrQbihCjFx73Y31c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7sxmtNBEHL//0WIJjKrqjNBENbiCm0KZntf1PVKAFaC2qAlyV1ImtvAeAdcmz6keHaikNm9IUyDqlpoV/Z2I=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:971a:: with SMTP id jg26mr19085118ejc.317.1615729190787; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0155CC72-571D-4540-8BD2-5A3B7FE4F7FB@lancaster.ac.uk> <11840e55-3942-780f-00c6-038bd0a56d8c@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <11840e55-3942-780f-00c6-038bd0a56d8c@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:39:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=S_etV-GUWS6-z4jUAa8Q7RCf4EQTsi-5pVAB3Ld5N=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "Hutchison, David" <d.hutchison@lancaster.ac.uk>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000785c5c05bd7f448f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/72Z--QP798Ct5b9DtIgi_F2PS9I>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] centralization
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:39:54 -0000

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:33 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:
>
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 12/03/2021 11:44, Hutchison, David wrote:
> >
> > Of course, I agree resilience is an important topic to pursue -- and
> > like Toerless I was disappointed to see the previous "lukewarm"
> > response ...
> Yeah, me too. It was funny that we had a good discussion
> on this list around the end of 2019 but then once we
> started a new list [1] it totally died. My conclusion
> was that indicated that people were interested in chatting
> but not in doing actual work on this topic.

I'm not sure what that work would look like. A lot of what makes resilience
is operational and engineering lessons that get shared in a very different
community and that are very implementation specific.

That isn't really the IETF's strength or audience. It's certainly an
important topic.

>
> S.
>
> [1] https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/chirp
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss



--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email