Re: [arch-d] Development of Internet Protocol "Five Fields" (IP-FF): Presentation

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 05 January 2016 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3221B1A9114 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:57:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSY-6ppqFI2v for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1061A9111 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u05KuPfR016814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:56:26 -0800 (PST)
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, Theodore V Faber <theodore.v.faber@aero.org>
References: <CAOJ6w=H7bs8kGt+ct=DKaVOtNcnD6PnouzpjmmLTL3P=C-Zynw@mail.gmail.com> <D2B140A5.27F7%theodore.v.faber@aero.org> <9020D012-C361-45E2-9C31-B39E852E239B@tony.li>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <568C2DF9.2060003@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:56:25 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9020D012-C361-45E2-9C31-B39E852E239B@tony.li>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/FqUVGrMpJmKrYpksLtUeUdwvWtM>
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Development of Internet Protocol "Five Fields" (IP-FF): Presentation
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:57:15 -0000


On 1/5/2016 10:14 AM, Tony Li wrote:
>> > On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Theodore V Faber <theodore.v.faber@aero.org> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Let us know when you’ve implemented something.
> 
> … and when you’ve thought about the routing implications of your design.

...and when you have a plan for tech transition.

It's very easy to redesign any protocol if you ignore the need to
support legacy systems.

Joe