IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Development of Internet Protocol "Five Fields" (IP-FF): Presentation

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Sun, 03 January 2016 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13C51A1A78 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 14:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEt74Vz6G2yd for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 14:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:3100:a006:1::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14A681A1A77 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 14:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:8b5:347b:481:ef2c:84db] (global-hq.muada.nl [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:8b5:347b:481:ef2c:84db] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id u03MHCTV075707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:17:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ6w=H7bs8kGt+ct=DKaVOtNcnD6PnouzpjmmLTL3P=C-Zynw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 23:20:22 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2638A7CD-E7B5-4CAB-A25B-B2B665681FE8@muada.com>
References: <CAOJ6w=H7bs8kGt+ct=DKaVOtNcnD6PnouzpjmmLTL3P=C-Zynw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/e8hkTBfezTcfRT7l1MhRJAlk7sY>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Development of Internet Protocol "Five Fields" (IP-FF): Presentation
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 22:20:49 -0000

Hi Alexey,

On 03 Jan 2016, at 14:41, Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com> wrote:

> Secretly in the shadows, I have been developing a new Internet
> Protocol "Five Fields" for quite some time. It is designed to be
> superior than both IPv4 and IPv6. And even made a nice presentation
> about IP-FF and it's features:

I read 13 slides or so, but I hadn't encountered the header diagram yet.

The part that bothers me is that you feel the address notation is the biggest issue.

We can fix that without getting rid of IPv6. There's no reason why 1234.5678.910.1112.1314 can't be an IPv6 address. Just pad the ~ 50 bits specified with 78 zero bits and you're in business.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email