IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 13 December 2022 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E755FC152587; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:33:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVg044m0G0Ju; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:33:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2439FC1522C0; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:33:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dslb-002-202-026-091.002.202.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([2.202.26.91] helo=smtpclient.apple); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1p57HE-0002oI-NZ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:33:04 +0100
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-Id: <26C5EC79-FBDB-465F-A787-E5DB354CFE6B@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E11525F7-860A-4A2C-ADC4-BA69E560EFF6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:33:04 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn4LkVX2WLGm7biwPrD5E=CHpdSyMoruvWgwPwniV908dA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab@iab.org
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <166862348898.27211.16338265887689375983@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAB75xn4LkVX2WLGm7biwPrD5E=CHpdSyMoruvWgwPwniV908dA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1670945587;0abfe911;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1p57HE-0002oI-NZ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/k5nvOY9y_gxv7hTXrXkt4j4ncpc>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:33:11 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

Thanks for your feedback! Please see below. 

> On 7. Dec 2022, at 14:49, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> This seems like a good I-D for IAB to work on. 

Thanks!

> 
> I suggest explicitly stating the scope and who the "user" is! I ask for this because I don't think we would do this to a control plane protocol inside the service provider network for instance. Otherwise the document provides a good summary of the efforts and how they could be applied in future protocols. 

The document is about privacy, so I guess there needs to be a human somewhere (at least indirectly, e.g. if you think about IoT devices), so have any privacy issue. However, I think some of these techniques could also make sense for control protocols, e.g. if you are able to identify single nodes in a network that can reveal more business-relevant information than needed.

>  
> Nits
> - Expand OHAI, MASQUE, PPM

Done. Though PPM was already spelled out…?

> - Section 3.1 uses the term "target" whereas figure 4 and 5 uses "server"!

Yes, we actually also use target in the text for the masque section, so I aligned the figure now as well1!

Thanks!
Mirja


> 
> Thanks! 
> Dhruv
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:02 AM IAB Executive Administrative Manager <execd@iab.org <mailto:execd@iab.org>> wrote:
> The IAB will discuss adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning (Partitioning as an Architecture for Privacy) on the IAB stream at its meeting on 2022-12-07.
> 
> The draft can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning/>
> 
> The agenda for the meeting will be posted 48 hours ahead of the meeting here: https://www.iab.org/wiki/index.php/Agenda <https://www.iab.org/wiki/index.php/Agenda>
> 
> Feedback about this draft can be sent in response to this mail on architecture-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, or to the IAB directly at iab@iab.org <mailto:iab@iab.org>.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:Architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email