IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 14 April 2021 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83AC3A17A2 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=oKf8+mub; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=tk9R0jl/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbAkak4fXngr for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201373A17D0 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31669 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2021 17:04:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7bb3.6077209e.k2104; bh=ufM949bjotlv5IiqofI5Lv/BdhpTPdU2YTnEOg8lokU=; b=oKf8+mubaRVJMZQJ95ySm2+K6wE/eBTTzNivXKFn8Zh2MDj76dqUZ34W+KPTbOTmGoPdC2gFhLbLdaSOEMBLChg9nKVtbJX4XOerytmMyotabAcfGfwcNgciPL4xeNq8u1KJW7cQFofOiY2K7yJEnbOw56/d25ivOa5UpS1m1al9g5xT9Y8J2UYhLBWXI91VmDo3FiFNYEeoEwrcLGZGln+B2LJZ6pPEoASWokQ7ZFQW/Qn6PFovnfFNNkr5hD6pBk6Qf1qvpNOOpk0Oy9A2lvwc9Tp6aNSouQcZU+vfjGU4BZOdC3s66rygA2iVX9kqmk6svTKrQy4CD6qB6+yC3g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7bb3.6077209e.k2104; bh=ufM949bjotlv5IiqofI5Lv/BdhpTPdU2YTnEOg8lokU=; b=tk9R0jl/N1G2iDKO8mLHJMGA2Yheyq6Mz51KvFYf2hqHXEmk/JSIm51xocPTZO4n0y1/ugXijdfR2QbFdrV0YLhSA0U5Z5eLMVBYqaginislbtoBPtrIpNZ9hcji6RbtNNQmJyCFLkl6gPhiPy7ajT7nqGWJIB8FoDkHHp1cBDtccs1+20YZiKG/mzIfXnfQq/LVrf48+1td1ZMRgv8XXgm86hFgq04PWNhVTYLgGY8ySp8LJd5/uIw/gTM32x2PaSPdH2tiZXZ4Qgw9d8qwESgZjM4bZ7Ueyk8Ub8llZkvYNgVo522zadNeO3ldLs+LHNF30EXfXGjGS0dG6EcD3g==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 14 Apr 2021 17:04:30 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4538A72E2E5F; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:04:29 -0400
Message-Id: <20210414170430.4538A72E2E5F@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: hlflanagan@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <fd0cf01a-af1f-4683-bc9a-a5c12f744b4a@Spark>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/A17UXEDYItT7P9K8KQzizmiipH4>
Subject: Re: [art] [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:04:39 -0000

It appears that heather flanagan  <hlflanagan@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I’m going to +1 John’s advice as well,  and suggest that if/when this group comes to a consensus on the topic, ask the RFC Editor to consider including
>the guidance in the style guide.

I believe the question is about dates in protocols rather than dates in RFC document text.

For dates in RFCs, we have the <date> element, which in the HTML version is rendered into an HTML <time> element,
so you can reformat the displayed version however you want.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email