Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!! onto https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 21 March 2024 00:23 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F3EC14F6EC for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHdENx8N7vUI for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40AFC14F75F for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5658082d2c4so437406a12.1 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710980515; x=1711585315; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Kyp4CrMOXMwtbA1bL36JPrUkfBFyzJYLq5v/lGivCxI=; b=jZ3Bpx1OvlDvFdqVBQ6KvQGnYNG9GicYuSmhHHO5JQU5GvawvBsstNWkpYqM7988D8 lc+xXZSh4ykiYVzdR4ryxVARuLTU08LwtdFOJ0JuZSZUPxdyHXkVZOE6oRbh/MuQ2Z5Z Wc2TlIIPujxlWoSluP8ygykvtRoOOTEb85sQOteVoIRih2gHb9idWwIFXdotlL3tcbY6 1TpgZ7BSz8j5z0PmJbRF5f9Ef/JygN3ob6mVzqdsb7ntkdiHtvneEsKtUe6r05i5//WN WgFwjjg9e36CuaoUPISefANG8tfhMjXs3ZJtiOXlwKNd35Y2dqxS5ak2lLp2zC1Zorka a7Bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710980515; x=1711585315; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Kyp4CrMOXMwtbA1bL36JPrUkfBFyzJYLq5v/lGivCxI=; b=odzaxpu9UpmViSK4bxYPhhr29+/HelcGcUQTpL5cuBOfiBfPGaOx5n+7iphvoXSEB4 xs/mQyJqYgFYu2D070D7vJnwP+FpYktWpMim5vmc+GTNJL2wqVTmtFagmNft5qVphhoE xTF/V5J9mSEOibvhlWb/NrQ9fqdi30GaAH+nE6lF0G1xiIl50zMgaJGUDAhLCF8vsJ0m 0a9rahPfFZpYIK38MRWkL1zWBoIdOS2z2UDeUMgQou8LudJPHVs1eu+52n3mwBiXTbl5 6gHrS8+/MTKBr9jX57bgBEMJFUKvTMefxqtsJ7w/GK++t682q/YJID9vO1mmguNVT2yh y5jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4w0MzSOiwQJsNk7BxL+CAoqNlNbnL/ovNWwQY8KTdj/TtrF5v MlWLdxQZOObYX+4FzkzA7AdRDzMH2OWTWKhroQnpWSdjIi7CUJY3Tf53w1C09otrI/iqtQFAWYH xdtgtPnAeVb4yIOiwpX2J8984TniCFlVpWjdNpw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFL4PmYbRWWq4euNLABkmmZrnp01jZUX7wtjRcxtIxPk+7xfO/xd/O3BtdJZouP4rlSjfp6ZAA/VS6ZycxEJmQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5409:b0:56a:fbe9:80a4 with SMTP id ev9-20020a056402540900b0056afbe980a4mr4724204edb.1.1710980514851; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:21:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyVmTtJDpcpf_oojstOzer9nJy5xUamEkvomonO0ggVMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: ART Area <art@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce3381061420b1e4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Qu2jkdQuh2p3CxAWHKiQZTZBY2M>
Subject: Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!! onto https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:23:02 -0000
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > That means there's something wrong in your mail setup Well, the problem is that you send aggressive rejection messages. It's fine to ignore people, but you make it an attack. thanks, Rob
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… John Levine
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… John Levine
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… John Levine
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Rob Sayre
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… John C Klensin
- Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!… Steffen Nurpmeso