Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!! onto https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

[Steffen Nurpmeso <[e-mail]>]

John Levine wrote in
 <[e-mail]>:
 |It appears that Rob Sayre  <[e-mail]> said:
 |>-=-=-=-=-=-
 |>
 |>John Levine <[e-mail]> wrote:
 |>> That means there's something wrong in your mail setup
 |>
 |>Well, the problem is that you send aggressive rejection messages.
 |>
 |>It's fine to ignore people, but you make it an attack.
 |
 |Uh, what? If someone tries to send a message with bare CR or LF, my
 |mail server rejects the message and says why in the status message at
 |the end of the transaction. I can tell you from experience that it
 |rejects hundreds of malformed messages from botnets for every one from
 |someone with a real but misconfigured MTA.
 |
 |Are you saying I should silently discard them?  That seems ill advised.

P.S.: you are all right.
I could not go without retesting, and i did

                if(c == '\015' && *cp == '\012'){
                        ++cp;
                        continue;
                }
  if(c == '\015' || c == '\012')
          continue;
                if(c == '\015' || c == '\012' || su_cs_is_blank(c)){
                ...

and Google actually takes the message.
Wietse Venema already said it weeks ago, did he?
I did test that, but obviously somehow the state was as such
messed when i did.

I apologise for the inconvenience and the faulty errata.
Good night.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)