Re: [art] not an erratum in RFC 6376, was Argh!!!! onto https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

[Steffen Nurpmeso <[e-mail]>]

John Levine wrote in
 <[e-mail]>:
 |It appears that Steffen Nurpmeso  <[e-mail]> said:
 |>Hello.
 |>
 |>(I take you off the address list since i now always seem to get
 |>
 |>  <[e-mail]>: host mx1.taugh.com[64.57.183.56] said:
 |>    554 5.6.0 Bare CR or LF not accepted. (in reply to end of DATA \
 |>    command)
 |>
 |>even though i use postfix 3.9, .. and already before had those new
 |>configuration settings.)
 |
 |That means there's something wrong in your mail setup that is sending
 |bare carriage returns or line feeds. As the saying goes, Don't Do
 |That. If you really can't figure it out, send me a message from some
 |non-broken mail system and I can arrange to catch some of the
 |offending messages and see what's in them.
 |
 |>|We quite deliberately did not speculate about what one might do with
 |>|a block of text that is sort of like a 5322 message but isn't one.
 |>
 |>But .. that is what happens in real life software? 
 |
 |The issue of what to do what bare CR and LF has been batted around for
 |decades, and we have decided that there is no answer better than saying
 |don't do that if you want to interoperate.
 |
 |See, for example, the last paragraph on page 13 of RFC 5321, published \
 |in 2008.

What an old outdated thing, it even has page numbers.
That is about domain names...  Well at least you do no longer
bounce me due to "excessive spam", that dummie stage i've passed.
I send this once i have tried to register the errata, wait..
[sigh]

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)