Re: [art] Predictable Internet Time

Philip Homburg <pch-ietf-art@u-1.phicoh.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7424128656 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-zgC6HHCxrq for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6-tun.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:888:1044:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF37129474 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #130) id m1ctEy7-0000G9C; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:53:03 +0200
Message-Id: <m1ctEy7-0000G9C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ietf-art@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bF054DD66@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <e0a43370-751f-808c-3719-9716f9cd57d1@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1701031348430.7102@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <f94415b6-d9f7-0a03-cf5b-ce39c109aa71@isi.edu> <f9429571-b9d5-75d4-9b46-b877a189a7bf@gmail.com> <20170328173916.GE7490@localhost> <e73d5c15-1ba3-8162-f7df-555e2e8588a6@isi.edu> <20170328224041.GJ7490@localhost> <9ddcde60-a915-a03d-dfc3-2c2c451c398c@isi.edu> <20170329000601.GK7490@localhost> <96ad09b7-7dc2-20e8-2aa4-793310d184f6@isi.edu> <20170329015811.GL7490@localhost> <111c86bc-c2c5-5050-edc0-82e40d36c570@isi.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:35:06 -0700 ." <111c86bc-c2c5-5050-edc0-82e40d36c570@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:53:01 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/ddefIauKzAOZNXV4KgytzMPxTrM>
Subject: Re: [art] Predictable Internet Time
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:53:06 -0000

>I know of no POSIX system with a cesium atomic clock.
>
>The issue is that POSIX really runs off of whatever local source of time
>passage is available, and can (and does) drift from TAI on *each*
>system. That drift can't be determined until your system tries to sync
>with an external source (e.g., via NTP).

To be completely pedantic, a single cesium clock will also drift from TAI/UTC.

There is no such concept as being in sync with TAI without external
corrections.

To be even more pedantic, of course that depends on the desired accuracy.
A cesium clock could easily stay within one hour from TAI for a period of a 100
years. A random PC with a quarz crystal at room temperature would have a hard
time doing that.