Re: 6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up )

mathew <meta@pobox.com> Tue, 15 July 2003 22:22 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08619 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cYBB-0005uB-QT for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:49 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6FMLn8G022698 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cYBB-0005u1-MR for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08608; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19cYB8-0006P4-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:46 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19cYB2-0006P1-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:40 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cYAP-0005ma-NV; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:21:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cY9w-0005m0-MX for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:20:32 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08540 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:20:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19cY9r-0006O9-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:20:27 -0400
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19cY9h-0006Na-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:20:17 -0400
Received: from pobox.com (h005018086b3b.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.45.164](untrusted sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20030715221910014000mshce>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:19:10 +0000
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
Subject: Re: 6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up )
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: mathew <meta@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <B1F08F445F370846AB7BEE424365F00D0188CDC7@ctxchg.ciphertrust.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
X-Image-Url: http://meta.ATH0.com/photos/MailPictures/meta@pobox.com
Message-Id: <5B6D64E8-B712-11D7-8867-00039380F1B6@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:19:10 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 09:56 AM, Paul Judge wrote:
> Mathew, it sounds like you are volunteering to lead some work into the
> "sender pays" approach. Good. Do you have any preliminary ideas?

Yes, but they're in my head at the moment.

>  Is what you're thinking along the lines of Selling Interrupt Rights 
> or SHRED or is it a different approach?
[...]
> IBM's Selling Interrupt Rights:
> http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/414/forum.pdf

My thought is that something similar to "Selling Interrupt Rights" is 
probably what's needed, but I think it's premature to say that that's 
exactly right in all details.

I think what I'd like to do is try and get some agreement on 
requirements. For instance, *I* think a fairly basic requirement should 
be that the user be allowed to set the interrupt price at zero, so if 
people want to keep on allowing the entire world to send them e-mail 
for free, they can do so--nobody would be forced to adopt the new 
system.

On the other hand, I don't see the proposed "escrow" mechanism as being 
very worthwhile, for social reasons: it becomes a source of potential 
friction between sender and recipient. If the recipient decides whether 
to deduct the fee after receiving the e-mail, the sender is liable to 
take it as a personal slight. Better to always deduct the fee, which 
will also act as a form of market pressure to keep fees low.  But hey, 
I could be convinced otherwise.

Canonical example: You'd like to discourage your mother from sending 
you those endlessly-forwarded chain letters and heartwarming e-mails. 
If you set an interrupt price of a nickel, she might stop and think 
before pushing the send button ten times a day. But if you have to push 
a button to "punish" her and take the nickel, are you really going to 
do it?

So anyway, should I set up a mailing list for the discussion?


mathew


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg