Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping
Steve Schear <schear@attbi.com> Sat, 22 March 2003 00:25 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA03337 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:25:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2M0i5U21900 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:44:05 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2M0i5O21897 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:44:05 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA03309 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:24:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2M0fMO21800; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:41:22 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2M0edO21752 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:40:39 -0500
Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA03251 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:21:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from video.attbi.com (12-235-20-211.client.attbi.com[12.235.20.211]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with SMTP id <2003032200235000100d11ipe>; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:23:50 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030321162328.048ae690@mail.attbi.com>
X-Sender: schear@mail.attbi.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
To: wayne <wayne@midwestcs.com>, asrg@ietf.org
From: Steve Schear <schear@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping
In-Reply-To: <x4u1dwxvff.fsf@footbone.midwestcs.com>
References: <oydllz8muel.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu> <011301c2efb6$4bea2e40$6401a8c0@damien> <oydu1dwhi16.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu> <3E7B3F96.3030803@garbagedump.com> <p06000b04baa0f659aa6b@[192.168.1.104]> <oydllz8muel.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:26:07 -0800
At 03:27 PM 3/21/2003 -0600, wayne wrote: >In <oydllz8muel.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu> Scott A Crosby <scrosby@cs.rice.edu> >writes: > > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:07:43 -0500, Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com> > writes: > > > > > ISPs did (and all ISPs wore white hats), then we wouldn't be sitting > > > here. From the white-hat ISP perspective, outbound spam is a bug in > > > their security. e-stamps won't fix that. > > > > Outbound spam is not a bug in security. Outbound spam is like any > > other outbound communication. Bits are sent to the internet sourced > > from their customers. Though it may be annoying to you, is my ability > > to give you a prank phone call a bug in the telephone system? > >Prank phone calls are illegal. Your ablility to make a single prank >call is not a bug in the telephone system. If you had the ablility to >make even a dozen prank phone calls per week without being caught, >then I would say there is a bug in the telephone systems. But anyone can. Just go to random pay phones and make the calls. Of course, the costs associated with this mean that those calls have got to be somewhat important to you. Stamps to the same. If its free it gets abused. If it costs value judgements come into the picture. steve _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Vernon Schryver
- Parameters for success? (was Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffT… Chuq Von Rospach
- [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons mike.pearson
- Re: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons Frank de Lange
- RE: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons Frank de Lange
- RE: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons Frank de Lange
- RE: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons halloran parry
- [Asrg] Stamping Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons Valdis.Kletnieks
- [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Stamping David Finnie
- [Asrg] Re: Stamping Scott A Crosby
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Damien Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Stamping Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping C Wegrzyn
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Frank de Lange
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Scrambled headers? Rob
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping C Wegrzyn
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping C Wegrzyn
- Re: [Asrg] Scrambled headers? Fred Baker
- Re: [Asrg] Scrambled headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- [Asrg] Re: Stamping Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Scrambled headers? Frank de Lange
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Kee Hinckley
- "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping) Adam Back
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Valdis.Kletnieks
- [Asrg] Re: Stamping Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- [Asrg] Re: Stamping Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping wayne
- [Asrg] Re: Stamping Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Steve Schear
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Damien Morton
- [OffTopic - NNTP] RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == h… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Steve Schear
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Steve Schear
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… william
- Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP] Chuq Von Rospach
- [Asrg] Prank phone calls (was Re: Stamping) mathew
- [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP] mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP] Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP] Matt Sergeant
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… David Finnie
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… David Finnie
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Steve Schear
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Valdis.Kletnieks
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping) Scott A Crosby
- Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stam… Valdis.Kletnieks