IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping

wayne <wayne@midwestcs.com> Fri, 21 March 2003 21:29 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28027 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:29:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2LLlkh08770 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:47:46 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2LLljO08767 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:47:45 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28024 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:28:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2LLi7O08648; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:44:07 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2LLhuO08591 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:43:56 -0500
Received: from backbone.midwestcs.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA27958 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:24:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from footbone.midwestcs.com ([206.222.212.237] helo=midwestcs.com) by backbone.midwestcs.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18wU2a-0002Qb-00 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:27:04 -0600
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping
References: <011301c2efb6$4bea2e40$6401a8c0@damien> <oydu1dwhi16.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu> <3E7B3F96.3030803@garbagedump.com> <p06000b04baa0f659aa6b@[192.168.1.104]> <oydllz8muel.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From: wayne <wayne@midwestcs.com>
In-Reply-To: <oydllz8muel.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <x4u1dwxvff.fsf@footbone.midwestcs.com>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanner: exiscan *18wU2a-0002Qb-00*4Uqw9IGl35.* ()
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:27:00 -0600

In <oydllz8muel.fsf@bert.cs.rice.edu> Scott A Crosby <scrosby@cs.rice.edu> writes:

> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:07:43 -0500, Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com> writes:
> 
> > ISPs did (and all ISPs wore white hats), then we wouldn't be sitting
> > here.  From the white-hat ISP perspective, outbound spam is a bug in
> > their security.  e-stamps won't fix that.
> 
> Outbound spam is not a bug in security. Outbound spam is like any
> other outbound communication. Bits are sent to the internet sourced
> from their customers. Though it may be annoying to you, is my ability
> to give you a prank phone call a bug in the telephone system?

Prank phone calls are illegal.  Your ablility to make a single prank
call is not a bug in the telephone system.  If you had the ablility to
make even a dozen prank phone calls per week without being caught,
then I would say there is a bug in the telephone systems.



-wayne

    


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status