IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios

Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk> Tue, 09 February 2010 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FAC3A73BB for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ey1drv5Co8DQ for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sivits.uscs.susx.ac.uk (sivits.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.14.88]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F07628C1F8 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk ([139.184.135.133]:61550) by sivits.uscs.susx.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.64) (envelope-from <iane@sussex.ac.uk>) id KXKYD8-000EKI-J3 for asrg@irtf.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:15:08 +0000
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:14:32 +0000
From: Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
Sender: iane@sussex.ac.uk
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <74B7EB91209E5550B7BBB2E9@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20100208202405.92F822425C@panix5.panix.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002080111310.16135@simone.lan> <4B706D03.6050605@bearnet.com> <20100208202405.92F822425C@panix5.panix.com>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01uWkNOCLKe5361mGaJY8s3oCrH+EukhyPLtQ=; token_authority=support@its.sussex.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Sussex: true
X-Sussex-transport: remote_smtp
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:13:28 -0000

--On 8 February 2010 15:24:05 -0500 Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote:

>
>> Since the Yahoo mail is being forwarded to Gmail, I would think it
>> would be more valuable to have Gmail doing the spam filtering.
>
> Why?  If _either_ of them blocked it, the user wouldn't see it.

That's an interesting question. Does gmail filter mail that it fetches 
through POP?

-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email