Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25> for your review
Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> Tue, 12 March 2024 08:18 UTC
Return-Path: <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A9EC14F69F; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iit.cnr.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPxRar4_CxUw; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.iit.cnr.it (mx3.iit.cnr.it [146.48.58.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76DCC14F6A9; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx3.iit.cnr.it D68146012FA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iit.cnr.it; s=mx320231221; t=1710231514; bh=BXtCL9tJi/IyJXuNaWj5zCkBuyAVEl2MWHAnN0U5DAQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=rRqzEYYKrvLLEnfbSdpnk3+GU28NoUHc9LLlAp6T9grGvumqxoCWQnWtCglKYbY2e 6pAJExFnWMKQ5TynZMQfJRJgQ3Qu483OvyiSIWD+VN8ryrk9IHWU//j6JhbL4cUe6l qTMGR3UWkpIRNN5xv+QfFCwdx9HwRYjug/z5F8/218ljq0R6tJ3MaS58/CwU8//RL1 MgXAVAGLM3rEc184rvF6t6wzYN/Tlc3/DXl671jxgexVR8DXca2Bfg/BfNXmVCiUTB 77JlLfXJoa7PP+CnLnMURFqBwQhUknLQQw8gsKT8EcJe1H3cPuXWEsrMvl//MKGctA bMT2+N67Kp92Q==
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68146012FA; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:18:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx3.iit.cnr.it
Received: from mx3.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id xrTZSKXZW78z; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:18:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Relay-Autenticated: yes
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------IHmcAujKFftDmfCUwvpnhDuR"
Message-ID: <90b99f52-c571-4f48-99da-c9b4f2bfe41d@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:13:25 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: it
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, maurizio.martinelli@iit.cnr.it
Cc: regext-ads@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, tomh@apnic.net, superuser@gmail.com, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
References: <20240308220159.3A39255D4B@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
In-Reply-To: <20240308220159.3A39255D4B@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/JRRJOJuj6KdfsrC3fKp2Bq_wwTY>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:18:43 -0000
I approve this RFC for publication. Mario Il 08/03/2024 23:01, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org ha scritto: > *****IMPORTANT***** > > Updated 2024/03/08 > > RFC Author(s): > -------------- > > Instructions for Completing AUTH48 > > Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and > approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. > If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies > available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/). > > You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties > (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing > your approval. > > Planning your review > --------------------- > > Please review the following aspects of your document: > > * RFC Editor questions > > Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor > that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as > follows: > > <!-- [rfced] ... --> > > These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. > > * Changes submitted by coauthors > > Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your > coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you > agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. > > * Content > > Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot > change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular attention to: > - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) > - contact information > - references > > * Copyright notices and legends > > Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in > RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions > (TLP –https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/). > > * Semantic markup > > Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of > content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that <sourcecode> > and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at > <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>. > > * Formatted output > > Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the > formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is > reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting > limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. > > > Submitting changes > ------------------ > > To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all > the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties > include: > > * your coauthors > > *rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team) > > * other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., > IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the > responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). > > *auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list > to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion > list: > > * More info: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc > > * The archive itself: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ > > * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out > of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter). > If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you > have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, > auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and > its addition will be noted at the top of the message. > > You may submit your changes in one of two ways: > > An update to the provided XML file > — OR — > An explicit list of changes in this format > > Section # (or indicate Global) > > OLD: > old text > > NEW: > new text > > You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit > list of changes, as either form is sufficient. > > We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem > beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, > and technical changes. Information about stream managers can be found in > the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager. > > > Approving for publication > -------------------------- > > To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating > that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, > as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval. > > > Files > ----- > > The files are available here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536.txt > > Diff file of the text: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Diff of the XML: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536-xmldiff1.html > > The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own > diff files of the XML. > > Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536.original.v2v3.xml > > XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates > only: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9536.form.xml > > > Tracking progress > ----------------- > > The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9536 > > Please let us know if you have any questions. > > Thank you for your cooperation, > > RFC Editor > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9536 (draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25) > > Title : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Reverse Search > Author(s) : M. Loffredo, M. Martinelli > WG Chair(s) : James Galvin, Antoin Verschuren > > Area Director(s) : Murray Kucherawy, Francesca Palombini > > -- Dott. Mario Loffredo Senior Technologist Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Web:http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-regex… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <dra… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-r… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-r… Maurizio Martinelli
- [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-r… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-r… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9536 <draft-ietf-r… Alanna Paloma