Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10> for your review
Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 15:52 UTC
Return-Path: <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53F4C14F70C; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="POvjvDJy"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="df9YHirT"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQhbUo-YDHfK; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5CFC14F680; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36B51140094; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:52:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 11:52:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1712073141; x=1712159541; bh=30vufYh04XFcN3G+IYDUZAuRXwP+LL/5Z7M4I0S+TVg=; b= POvjvDJyShTik/jDbFTsu1asEiDxxWUIeUJeYwaYUnEoPcGoIy4iEc/286g946A/ EBseEDyV23MiKEFttuHxqs4KWZs4orGkuAcHDp7PiGBROfvykIlbJs04YRxIJrN2 x25JExHTS8ZRVjLqeqIoLTmdBIe6nuDxtpmK9yOku/khm+1b6dXHExE/UqcZuPxs l0kq9JL0jhVdI2QjvqaakUex7p99LlswG2fEJcwJm8HZ+1u9a9p6yIiOc2d/rlP+ 0YCf4umCmKQlFGGsSCKCwd1SJJLIhumgzU0OBi3Vy6REMeTlBojdaFCctrbwhcgN 3EwU9yX1aukIB0/mH27v0w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712073141; x=1712159541; bh=30vufYh04XFcN3G+IYDUZAuRXwP+ LL/5Z7M4I0S+TVg=; b=df9YHirTrOWFu3PuZFTWb/jbaiRo5Z23BTBLwi/SuCyM y0NgY1Y/SWyMcTeMC5UgzoNzyiH2I3Cv8Yni9Gu+77iRydj5Y1Lv17m+hTIchLWs Jzr+bMpWtLzTf7baHUAS0+kd/I/zEh7li7qwkMxRwGhXgqJsCJtbLO7cp5Jeqmkj NZ79GDj2Gg0IW3Vn342Tzio7ddYxoErBBWS9q9OD2JvchXnOkjfcNkxI7m00kojo GBZaMxNgJdf5Jtxqd6RrwIIEijY+UEqEuRxpZ8HS9qaawU519Sj2aerzMY2f8F+t rEngTvKNkakgEFPFnPfnr4+gcoFMF/u1BOTkGmvb2w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tSkMZpaZTJjC-WYjLiW7Va9sSE2Qb_frDgHDWsbLY6AGm_kPy2mhCQ> <xme:tSkMZgZF2Jx6rQMRtRDP-GPgBiIu0y9wRpkfxgOFsiUKROmgY9y-TxCOsMeENX0dj Ri8pb4Arp1hNA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudefvddgleegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehmtderreerreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfho sggvrhhtucfuthgvphgrnhgvkhdfuceorhhsthhosehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeehvdektdelgfefieetgeffudevfedvfefhgeet jedvieehhfeuveetteffgfejnecuffhomhgrihhnpehrfhgtqdgvughithhorhdrohhrgh dpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomheprhhsthhosehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tSkMZr8fAeNTVC1HMmUg9odidx4WFnQuadvnaczIQMn-Apw6XzUArQ> <xmx:tSkMZnqK99Q862AiVZW4BD6glT3bz_Jk6g7fjYLtQXc4J3cQ_KBD8A> <xmx:tSkMZkpWi8RntB-lNyGM2hQzAEIJ_Vdwz0Ox9MVfS0r5JLaZZl35rw> <xmx:tSkMZtTV-Bf1SQpLgx_KLbTms44cDMykh-0LEizKbrne7g8Tojmivg> <xmx:tSkMZleQC8hD9IG0BbbrkomZU-_Dmsgw7k6y4LcFYVl_0AcH77aN2Mxj>
Feedback-ID: ia5d944da:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id EA1E52D4007D; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-368-gc733b1d8df-fm-20240402.001-gc733b1d8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <2ffce6d6-b5f1-45f4-a9aa-8eb34963c954@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48b5c001-604f-4982-9ce4-c39936733b4b@app.fastmail.com>
References: <20240315214259.96B0D1FFA18E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <48b5c001-604f-4982-9ce4-c39936733b4b@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:51:17 +0200
From: Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
To: rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Cc: calext-ads@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="66cca47bc6a94d47b7ef4cb667e204d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/K28fzR0vFLi8vdLvDBTDZAJARs0>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 15:52:27 -0000
Hi, I am very sorry but we only come to realize there's a wrong example in the RFC after we sent you the updated document. The correct RFC draft now is attached. Sorry for the mess, Robert On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, at 2:56 PM, Robert Stepanek wrote: > Dear Editors, > > thanks for your review. We now updated the document (attached) accordingly. > > Best regards, > Robert > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, at 10:42 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: >> *****IMPORTANT***** >> >> Updated 2024/03/15 >> >> RFC Author(s): >> -------------- >> >> Instructions for Completing AUTH48 >> >> Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and >> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. >> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies >> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/). >> >> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties >> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing >> your approval. >> >> Planning your review >> --------------------- >> >> Please review the following aspects of your document: >> >> * RFC Editor questions >> >> Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor >> that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as >> follows: >> >> <!-- [rfced] ... --> >> >> These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. >> >> * Changes submitted by coauthors >> >> Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your >> coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you >> agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. >> >> * Content >> >> Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot >> change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular attention to: >> - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) >> - contact information >> - references >> >> * Copyright notices and legends >> >> Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in >> RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions >> (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/). >> >> * Semantic markup >> >> Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of >> content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that <sourcecode> >> and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at >> <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>. >> >> * Formatted output >> >> Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the >> formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is >> reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting >> limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. >> >> >> Submitting changes >> ------------------ >> >> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all >> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties >> include: >> >> * your coauthors >> >> * rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team) >> >> * other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., >> IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the >> responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). >> >> * auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list >> to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion >> list: >> >> * More info: >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc >> >> * The archive itself: >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ >> >> * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out >> of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter). >> If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you >> have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, >> auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and >> its addition will be noted at the top of the message. >> >> You may submit your changes in one of two ways: >> >> An update to the provided XML file >> — OR — >> An explicit list of changes in this format >> >> Section # (or indicate Global) >> >> OLD: >> old text >> >> NEW: >> new text >> >> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit >> list of changes, as either form is sufficient. >> >> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem >> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, >> and technical changes. Information about stream managers can be found in >> the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager. >> >> >> Approving for publication >> -------------------------- >> >> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating >> that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, >> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval. >> >> >> Files >> ----- >> >> The files are available here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554.txt >> >> Diff file of the text: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> Diff of the XML: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9554-xmldiff1.html >> >> >> Tracking progress >> ----------------- >> >> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9554 >> >> Please let us know if you have any questions. >> >> Thank you for your cooperation, >> >> RFC Editor >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC9554 (draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10) >> >> Title : vCard Format Extension for JSContact >> Author(s) : R. Stepanek, M. Loffredo >> WG Chair(s) : Bron Gondwana, Daniel Migault >> Area Director(s) : Murray Kucherawy, Francesca Palombini >> >> >> > > > *Attachments:* > • rfc9554.xml
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… rfc-editor
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calex… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-c… Robert Stepanek
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-c… Robert Stepanek
- [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-… Karen Moore
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Karen Moore
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Robert Stepanek
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Robert Stepanek
- [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-… Karen Moore
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Orie Steele
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Orie Steele
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Robert Stepanek
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Karen Moore
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Orie Steele
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Robert Stepanek
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Karen Moore
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Robert Stepanek
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-i… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-c… Karen Moore