Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10> for your review

Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 04 April 2024 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638ECC14F748; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="FQRYmut2"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="OMV+pTF/"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrV_5i-t3cRu; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.144]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00B4C1519AB; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DBE1C00218; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:13:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:13:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1712247193; x=1712333593; bh=JSZraP3IQJbx2o1Ibr11RPGVhXLe77YsrTZJLV2Ds6Y=; b= FQRYmut2T+6mEYMzHntslL31FnrlHolKtm7SDxu8IuXicWbfLRXyah4DLZGgJhWC SQa6+BCLeu0SkuFMudXdV10SWHOhV0+ylbvjsLm4nEbHKZRpvUBWuLH2+YHkWYrN IS6niM5cMThYaPbooCL2FdBepUKvU93wUH8d1yOzpmgMwyoN/kMvEWt6CHxEUhcZ oEkFIRMjjQWctiYKfjUC4rtRYg9EN5nCkHBL0K3u9XUYFXrpvrbXbjYIwwQOh0xI GgDoQEd3IpwaIcebH4RU4L3fyQX/zG+QPVpNFAeyGAnXBbr4V/0FrMXv6bkq1UZb u7KfsIrGGKij1cA1jfG6KA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712247193; x=1712333593; bh=JSZraP3IQJbx2o1Ibr11RPGVhXLe 77YsrTZJLV2Ds6Y=; b=OMV+pTF/UOCQC6RtVQz7oHHwDPB6w6eUFPIxB449PTI6 gD2V3dhNYpJuvLDBX8VPrRzw7Z0d3tOrDJGeqIczC7XBKc/GSDOBZ3d2zL5BYuJQ VFJYh3x9oT6Hc4NOHbllVJOJcdhYk7cCBb/veBmoIwfQnV2rE6vUDObrlA+tFGzY v8LIr78P7Mr1Grjqpe2H0oQ3/sbJ6NOEg1PY4xRYBLsTaOeBd0jXDr4o2L6a+OH8 e+2QV4yUQI+DWOS2x8bUBttIvde+fAJF71TClq6aMSSo6iBXCfs5MInIQn+VnuPI R3HVgAprscO/xvLkdHltwB71khpG0BO6FFJa68vXPg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mdEOZjPdsz7ReoRQnWRZj6HRfLTjc1W_v40IozoVW0gRs1wqzrrJPA> <xme:mdEOZt8cS7hzBKUfOYR62kGTZ5Mw8G409oj-aAzQylBKRBfkRCueAuDv_Ful1RPzg xKnInDJt7eX4g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudefkedgleelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsegrtderreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftfho sggvrhhtucfuthgvphgrnhgvkhdfuceorhhsthhosehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedvtdehgeejuedtvdfghfdtgfejleetudduieet hedtiedtieehhfetfeehveeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomheprhhsthhosehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mdEOZiT93-qi2j-UQRfqh_5r5wMZTzRRUdG_zBKmd3dE-Th9G0FITA> <xmx:mdEOZnuM4Bi9hgPPsulB-1PQy_zZbbMQepV5FSndA9842VCijCKY7Q> <xmx:mdEOZrcWer1owe-5cRvd95Jfy9t3gfO5B6zYS7vG4Q_ZmIDosyMPhg> <xmx:mdEOZj2y_oAsydyz6SXyPaaVWf1FCYt0lpHWLkRwzQ4iUZt9FRWd7w> <xmx:mdEOZtucwQjS43L6Ke-NyNYPZR06qJ273xZkgCnpSMWQcgK05HaYNAx4>
Feedback-ID: ia5d944da:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4B5082D4007D; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-368-gc733b1d8df-fm-20240402.001-gc733b1d8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <d6f5cc9c-1f28-49dd-a7fe-6526294a1142@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZJz=DLQmdAxJ1z+s8V56qRPn3hG8TY0GMa368Fkp9-GQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240315214259.96B0D1FFA18E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <48b5c001-604f-4982-9ce4-c39936733b4b@app.fastmail.com> <2ffce6d6-b5f1-45f4-a9aa-8eb34963c954@app.fastmail.com> <1A81437D-D40C-4BF0-92B6-99C48B2AF357@amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZrt9it4u1=A=oJ6sYc3uOr2uhsEOykJOBETg7BCoi=+Q@mail.gmail.com> <de8698f9-e930-4792-8f5c-f3d82ccbda91@app.fastmail.com> <CAL0qLwZJz=DLQmdAxJ1z+s8V56qRPn3hG8TY0GMa368Fkp9-GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:12:53 +0200
From: Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com>, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>, rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, calext-ads@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="87034fd7eac34f05af9d2072cd04d93d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/6L47g0dAM52ij-H_zsnZf5s5nZI>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 16:13:47 -0000

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024, at 5:00 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Changes like this not initiated by the RFC Editor during AUTH48 make ADs nervous.  It's not on the record that this change has WG consensus, even if it appears to be obviously the right thing to do.  The bulletproof solution here is to send it back to the WG to confirm, but I don't have a good feeling for how significant these changes are.
> Orie, this is your WG now.  What do you recommend?

To clarify: If we wouldn't have done these changes now, we would have had to file an errata the moment that document gets published. The changes are very insignificant, given that even no one in the WG even had seen that error during review.