IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9555 <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard-13> for your review

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 04 April 2024 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DF3C14F6B9; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phLlKeODoJEl; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D6CC14F6B2; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5586764bd0aso283723a12.0; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712243189; x=1712847989; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QUTdMJMfGBv3NxfBlOgZxHw3RB783qJ+CAkG2rmDEqc=; b=OFNIm/gYaR3xEEo8x+oBNaaMIvvOc2pEimUIhq1/hRzm+b8VTwY5cGQQFcNqont/8w N6G8k6dK66aDyOrr/WMaz1Oy03P51gEnHXvAUhSZeM6/xilsh2uyzv9O4BEQjOkOfIbB V3KY0zzPGnkbOtHAIaXRjX+4TUuhw4pqOgS7shrg6F0tKq9acvwnO1kYBB+Po8lKjAlv mwYcu8Zt1pSwBl4MszUB2AWFc8haoVwP/vQFEBsrQ+BeN+PO3rvZmfKGs4mTg+OEebSr QqnevVgm1waAtfbgrQnzyafPp60ZZvcCNOLZ6GNbhG2rWvMT0KBw1bMa1NsI+WInFVo5 +5vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712243189; x=1712847989; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QUTdMJMfGBv3NxfBlOgZxHw3RB783qJ+CAkG2rmDEqc=; b=bDTPTZNnZ6fuZutj6Gxw6pGp43YBgZN3SUw5R+xOsjSntu3lbH/i1gXHNnjYE9RW+Q 0zg270TYuUZs+g8nIiC71GQ8JUIasGZBwL3ubcY5cU2kYA0Ub07XfYicFRLbqrgLYd9N Ld8ezsLm5fH5Lws+0C5CUY8vsA4IpMKqQ/o7llffQ+zU0yVFIYrUQnLbxqTHPMgRPIOo wBBA9REvqcFXKm6PVe1m9GD9XzGifuhywl28CY1kYOSFxaVQW4aJfap75JUb3gxvQiEA oaJ3d6GbHM+U4ldj4jI4ivP1lh3XRKb9tPHy3pbk0SP9f1rHy1k4+C2Sha1piwZmw2gI oGzQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX2OHFq/OVX+rtEVEdIMk0J7QbfrRWaEee/pabuwKJ9DP19UE8NA0dCZBxVpKz3qOOP6BOzuaSxx5J6E2Yf29QEY8mxrgGw8Z+y5mohtv7Gsdvd5dbmNYeiyV+EbR4Ygo9r3MqJr+TJ
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzBcu8J/pb8e+jcDhDbb4coCdDCn9PmPQ84v19D1gCD5WWix3tM gdNi06bhFqWzTj6MYnOUTfzjHFLy5apnvpOl6wLxBnx/QrXvOZw4ZGRn0devsvatqA6DUyTP/iG 5suLPhIVG+ntuQyLFFG2nfZ4NDU4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHPBq86c9FSEslhBnRB1p4OxKWwVctpr0hL/cpH1hYGqwC3FiKWUtZCm7PZjDQKFCxyoKdhHUDJGgb6O+tMckY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9546:b0:a51:969e:ad4 with SMTP id ex6-20020a170907954600b00a51969e0ad4mr397700ejc.4.1712243188804; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240315215422.865F21FFA18E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <ef471cf5-4eb2-4000-a240-ea28d50658a1@app.fastmail.com> <82572788-B8CA-4189-9601-D116472C2CB5@amsl.com> <af77e1fb-2e3f-4545-a310-bfd6e20034ca@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <af77e1fb-2e3f-4545-a310-bfd6e20034ca@app.fastmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:06:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwageBPw8_jy9uDBRdsj__bmzh5K-GpP9eiXPvoqMsA18Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com>, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>, rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, calext-ads@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009b809061546afac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/8mv_JRkmnmKvV-SD4ODHnjALHWg>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9555 <draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard-13> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:06:36 -0000

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> attached is the updated document. Please see my replies below.
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024, at 2:08 AM, Karen Moore wrote:
>
> 1) Note that “vcard” is not on the list of acceptable sourcecode types.
> Please review the list at "
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt” and let us
> know if there is an applicable type that may be used instead of "vcard". If
> there isn’t one, you may suggest a new one (that we would run by RPAT for
> approval), or you can leave the “type" attribute blank.
>
>
> We now changed the sourcecode type to "text/vcard". We'll keep using
> "json" instead of "application/jscontact+json" for the JSContact examples.
>

Orie will have to decide, but this feels like a significant (i.e., not just
editorial, not correction of a simple error) change to be making in
AUTH48.  Should the WG confirm on the record first?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email